Do All Speak With Tongues?

Do All Speak With Tongues?

 

We shall now go on to consider some other objections or misunderstandings associated with the experience of speaking in tongues.

  The Gift of “Kinds of Tongues”

  One common objection or misunderstanding is based on a question Paul asked: “Do all speak with tongues?” (1 Cor. 12:30). A careful examination of the context shows that Paul clearly implies that the answer to his question is: “No – all do not speak with tongues.”

  Does this mean, then, that there were  professing Christian’s in the New Testament church who had received the baptism in the Holy Spirit without speaking with tongues?

  No, this is not what Paul is saying. Paul is not here speaking about the baptism in the Holy Spirit but about various supernatural manifestations of the Spirit, which can be exercised by the believer in the church subsequent to, and as a result of, the initial experience of being baptised in the Holy Spirit.

  This agrees with what Paul says two verses earlier.

   Now you are the body of Jesus, and members individually. And God has appointed these in the church: first apostles, second prophets, third teachers, after that miracles, then gifts of healings, helps, administrations, varieties of tongues
(1 Cor. 12:27-28).

   Paul is speaking of various ministries which may be exercised by different members within the church. Among these he enumerates “varieties of tongues” or, more literally, “kinds of tongues.”

 

Exactly the same expression is used by Paul still earlier in the same chapter when he enumerates nine gifts or manifestations of the Holy Spirit which may be granted to believers who have been baptised in the Holy Spirit. The list is as follows:

   

  But the manifestation of the Spirit is given to each one for the profit of all: for to one is given the word of wisdom through the Spirit, to another the word of knowledge through the same Spirit, to another faith by the same Spirit, to another gifts of healing by the same Spirit, to another the working of miracles, to another prophecy, to another discerning of spirits, to another different kinds of tongues, to another interpretation of tongues. But one and the same Spirit works all of these things, distributing to each one individually as He wills (1 Cor. 12:7-11).

   

  Paul is speaking about gifts of the Spirit which may be exercised by believers subsequent to their receiving the baptism in the Spirit. This is confirmed by what he says in verse 13: “For by one Spirit we were all baptised into one body.”

 

Or, more literally, “For in one Spirit we were all baptised into one body.”

 

Paul here speaks of the baptism in the Spirit as an experience that has already been received by those to whom he writes. The nine gifts or manifestations of the Spirit which he lists may then be exercised by believers subsequent to, and as a result of, they’re having been baptised in the Holy Spirit.

 

Paul indicates that though the baptism in the Holy Spirit is for all believers – “in one Spirit we were all baptised into one body” – thereafter the various gifts of the Spirit are divided up among the believers according to the sovereign will of the Spirit Himself. One believer may receive one gift and another believer may receive another gift. Not all believers receive all the gifts.

 

Among the nine gifts of the Spirit listed by Paul, the eighth is “different kinds of tongues.” The phrase in the original Greek – “kinds of tongues” – is exactly the same as that translated “varieties of tongues” in 1 Corinthians 12:28. In each case Paul is speaking about a specific spiritual gift, not about the baptism in the Holy Spirit.

 

It is outside the scope of this series to examine the operation of this particular gift. But you can study further about “The Reality of the Holy Spirit” Series.  It is sufficient to have established the fact that in 1 Corinthians 12:28, as in verse 10 of the same chapter, Paul is not talking about being baptised in the Holy Spirit but about one of the nine spiritual gifts exercised by some believers (but not by all) following the baptism in the Holy Spirit.

 

When Paul says, “Do all speak with tongues?” the question he has in mind is not: “Have all at one time spoken in tongues?” – that is, when they were initially baptised in the Holy Spirit (1 Cor. 12:30). On the contrary, he is asking: “Do all believers who have been baptised in the Holy Spirit regularly exercise the gift of ‘kinds of tongues’?” To this question the answer – both then and now – is a definite no. In this respect, the experience of modern believers after being baptised in the Spirit is in full accord with the pattern established in the New Testament.

 

This distinction between the initial gift of the Holy Spirit, attested by the evidence of speaking in tongues, and the subsequent gift of “kinds of tongues” is very carefully preserved by the linguistic usage of the New Testament. The Greek word used for “gift” when it denotes the gift of the Holy Spirit received at the baptism in the Spirit is dorea. The Greek word for “gift” when it denotes any of the nine different gifts or manifestations of the Spirit (including the gift of “kinds of tongues”) is charisma.

 

These two words are never interchanged in the New Testament. Charisma is never used to denote the gift of the Holy Spirit received at the baptism in the Spirit. Conversely, dorea is never used to denote any of the nine gifts of the Holy Spirit manifested in the lives of the believers who have received the baptism in the Holy Spirit. The language, teaching and examples of the New Testament all indicate a clear distinction between these two aspects of spiritual experience.

 

Is Fruit the Evidence?

Those who claim that speaking with tongues is not necessarily the evidence of having received the baptism in the Holy Spirit are obliged by logic to suggest some alternative evidence by which we may know, according to Scripture, that a person has received the baptism in the Holy Spirit.

  One such alternative evidence which is commonly proposed is that of spiritual fruit. The suggestion is that unless a person demonstrates in his life the fruit of the Holy Spirit in a full way, that person cannot be considered to have received the baptism in the Holy Spirit.

  The complete list of the fruit of the Holy Spirit is given by Paul in Galatians 5:22-23.

   

  But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, long-suffering, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, self-control.

   

  This and other passages make it plain that the primary fruit of the Spirit out of which all the rest develop is love.

 

Only a foolish, shallow-minded Christian’s would ever deny that spiritual fruit in general, and love in particular, are of supreme importance in the life of every Christian’s. This does not mean, however, that spiritual fruit is the scriptural evidence of having received the baptism in the Holy Spirit. In fact, this test of spiritual fruit must be rejected as contrary to Scripture on two main grounds: 

  1. it is not the test which the apostles themselves applied; 
  2. it overlooks the clear, scriptural distinction between a gift and fruit.

 

Let us consider first the test which the apostles applied in their own experience. When the 120 disciples on the day of Pentecost received the baptism in the Holy Spirit with the outward evidence of speaking with other tongues, Peter did not wait several weeks or months to see whether this experience would produce in his life and in the lives of the other disciples a much greater measure of spiritual fruit than they had previously enjoyed. On the contrary, he stood up the very same hour and said without any doubts or qualifications:

   

  But this is what was spoken by the prophet Joel: “And it shall come to pass in the last days,” says God, “that I will pour out of My Spirit on all flesh” (Acts 2:16-17).

   

  What evidence did Peter have for making this statement? Nothing but the fact that they all began to speak with other tongues. No further evidence besides this was required.

 

Again, after many people in Samaria had been converted through the preaching of Philip, Peter and John went down to pray for them that they might receive the Holy Spirit.

   

  Now when the apostles who were at Jerusalem heard that Samaria had received the word of God, they sent Peter and John to them, who, when they had come down, prayed for them that they might receive the Holy Spirit. For as yet He had fallen upon none of them. They had only been baptised in the name of the Lord Jesus. Then they laid hands on them, and they received the Holy Spirit. Now when Simon saw that through the laying on of the apostles’ hands the Holy Spirit was given, he offered them money, saying, “Give me this power also, that anyone on whom I lay hands may receive the Holy Spirit.” But Peter said to him, “Your money perish with you, because you thought that the gift of God could be purchased with money!” (Acts 8:14-20).

   

  From this account we understand that the people in Samaria had only been converted for a few days, or at the most a few weeks. Yet they received the Holy Spirit through the laying on of the apostles’ hands as a single, complete experience.

 

There was no question of waiting to see whether in the ensuing weeks and months sufficient spiritual fruit would be manifested in the lives of these new converts to prove that they really had received the Holy Spirit. No, they’re receiving the Holy Spirit was a single, complete experience, after which no further evidence or tests were needed.

 

The objection is sometimes raised that the Scripture does not explicitly state that these people in Samaria spoke with tongues when they received the Holy Spirit. This is quite true. However, the Scripture does make it plain that, through the laying on of the apostles’ hands, there was an open demonstration of supernatural power such that Simon, who had been a professional sorcerer, was willing to pay money to receive the power to produce a similar supernatural demonstration in anyone upon whom he might thereafter lay his hands.

 

If we accept that these people in Samaria, as a result of the laying on of the apostles’ hands, spoke with other tongues, this will fit in with every detail of the story as it is recorded in Acts, and it will also bring their experience into line with the cases of all the other people in the book of Acts who received the baptism in the Holy Spirit.

 

On the other hand, if people prefer to assume that in this particular incident in Samaria there was some supernatural manifestation other than speaking with tongues, they must at least acknowledge that we have no way of finding out what this other kind of manifestation was.

 

Upon this assumption, therefore, it is not possible to build any kind of positive doctrinal conclusion concerning the baptism in the Holy Spirit. For example, a person cannot say: “I have not spoken with tongues; nevertheless I know I have received the baptism in the Holy Spirit because I have received the same evidence or experience as the people of Samaria.” If the people of Samaria did not speak with tongues, there is no way of knowing what else they may have done instead.

 

Thus this assumption leads only to negative and sterile conclusions. It cannot in any way affect the positive conclusions we have formed from the other cases where we know that people, on receiving the baptism in the Spirit, did speak with tongues.

 

Another case which is sometimes brought forward is that of Saul of Tarsus – later the apostle Paul.

   

  And Ananias went his way and entered the house; and laying his hands on him he said, “Brother Saul, the Lord Jesus, who appeared to you on the road as you came, has sent me that you may receive your sight and be filled with the Holy Spirit.” Immediately there fell from his eyes something like scales, and he received his sight at once; and he arose and was baptised (Acts 9:17-18).

   

  Surely if there was ever a case where the early church might justifiably have applied the test of fruit, it was in the case of Saul of Tarsus. Up to that time he had been, on his own admission, the bitterest opponent of the gospel and persecutor of the church. Yet here we find him receiving the Holy Spirit in a single experience, through the laying on of the hands of Ananias, and thereafter there is not the faintest suggestion that any further test of fruit in his life might have to be applied.

 

Once again, there are those who object that the Scripture does not state that Saul (later Paul) spoke with tongues when Ananias laid hands on him. It is true the Scripture gives no details of what happened to Paul. However, side by side with this account in Acts 9, we must set Paul’s own testimony, as recorded in 1 Corinthians.

   

  I thank my God I speak with tongues more than you all (1 Cor. 14:18).

   

  When we combine this testimony of Paul’s with the other examples given in the book of Acts, it is reasonable to conclude that Paul first began to speak with tongues when Ananias laid his hands upon him for the infilling of the Spirit. This conclusion is strengthened by what happened when Paul in turn laid hands on new believers at Ephesus.

   

  And when Paul had laid hands on them, the Holy Spirit came upon them, and they spoke with tongues and prophesied (Acts 19:6).

   

  It would be unnatural to suppose that Paul laid his hands upon these converts to transmit to them an experience he himself had never received.

 

One further and decisive case is that of Cornelius and his household, as related in Acts 10. Peter and the other believing Jews went to the house of Cornelius with reluctance, against their own inclinations, only because God had explicitly directed them to go. After Peter had preached a short while, the Holy Spirit fell upon all who heard his word. Peter and the other Jews were amazed because they heard these Gentiles speaking with tongues.

 

Up to this very moment Peter, like other Jewish believers, had not conceived that it was possible for Gentiles such as Cornelius to be saved and become  professing Christian’s. Yet this one manifestation of speaking with tongues immediately convinced Peter and the other Jews that these Gentiles were now just as much  professing Christian’s as the Jews themselves. Peter never suggested that it would be necessary to subject these Gentiles to any further tests or to wait for spiritual fruit or to look for any other kind of evidence. On the contrary, he immediately commanded that they be baptised, by which act they were openly accepted and attested as full  professing Christian’s. Peter later gave an account of this incident to the other leaders of the apostolic church in Jerusalem.

   

  And as I began to speak, the Holy Spirit fell upon them, as upon us at the beginning . . . If therefore God gave them the same gift as He gave us when we believed on the Lord Jesus Christ.

   

  We know from the previous chapter that Cornelius and his household all spoke with tongues. Yet in this account Peter does not find it necessary to mention this decisive manifestation. He merely says: “The Holy Spirit fell upon them, as upon us at the beginning . . . God gave them the same gift as He gave us.” In other words, the manifestation of speaking with tongues was at this time so universally accepted as the evidence of receiving the Holy Spirit that Peter did not even need to mention it. Both he and the other church leaders took it for granted. The other church leaders concluded:

   

  When they heard these things they became silent; and they glorified God, saying, “Then God has also granted to the Gentiles repentance to life” (Acts 11:18).

   

  What convinced Peter and the other apostles that Gentiles could experience salvation through faith in Jesus just as fully as Jews? One thing, and one thing only: The fact that they heard these Gentiles speak with tongues. In the whole of this account there is never any suggestion that Peter or any other of the apostles ever looked for any other kind of evidence in the lives of these Gentiles, apart from the fact that they spoke with tongues. There was no question of waiting for spiritual fruit to be manifested.

 

In this the apostles were perfectly logical – not because fruit is unimportant, but because fruit is, by its very nature, totally different from a gift. A gift is received by a single act of faith; fruit is produced by a slow, gradual process, which includes planting, tending and cultivating.

 

The baptism in the Holy Spirit is a gift – a single experience – received by faith. The evidence that a person has received this gift is that he speaks with other tongues.

 

Thereafter, one main purpose for which the gift is given is to enable the person to produce more and better spiritual fruit than he could ever have produced otherwise. It is no error to emphasize the importance of fruit. The error consists in confusing a gift with a fruit, in confusing the evidence that a gift has been received with the purpose for which the gift has been given.

 

In the next session we will consider a number of other common misunderstandings connected with tongues as the evidence of having received the baptism in the Holy Spirit.

Copyright On Eagles Wings Ministries 2026

Receive the Holy Spirit

Receive the Holy Spirit

 

   A number of objections are often raised against our conclusion that the manifestation of speaking with tongues is the accepted New Testament evidence that a person has received the baptism in the Holy Spirit. For the sake of clarity and thoroughness, therefore, let us consider some of the most common objections.

 

One standard objection takes the following form: Every Christian’s automatically received the Holy Spirit at conversion and therefore does not need any further experience or any other evidence to have the assurance of having received the Holy Spirit.

 

Much confusion and controversy will be avoided once we establish one important, scriptural fact: The New Testament depicts two separate experiences, both of which are described as “receiving the Holy Spirit.” This means it is possible for a Christian’s to have “received the Holy Spirit” in one use of the expression but not in the other.

   

The Pattern of the Apostles

  A simple way to distinguish these two experiences is to compare the events of two Sundays, each uniquely important in the history of the Christian’s church. The first is resurrection Sunday; the second is Pentecost Sunday.

 

On resurrection Sunday Jesus appeared to the apostles in a group for the first time after His resurrection.

   

  He breathed on them, and said to them, “Receive the Holy Spirit” (John 20:22).

   

  Jesus’ breathing on the apostles was suited to the words which accompanied it: “Receive the Holy Spirit.” In Greek the same word pneuma means both “spirit” and “breath.” The words of Jesus could therefore be translated, “Receive holy breath.” Furthermore, the tense of the imperative form “receive” indicates that the receiving was a single, complete experience which took place as Jesus uttered the word. It is therefore an incontestable, scriptural fact that at that moment the apostles did actually “receive the Holy Spirit.”

 

In this first encounter with the resurrected Jesus, the apostles passed from “Old Testament salvation” to “New Testament salvation.” Up to that time the believers of the Old Testament had looked forward, by faith, through prophecies and types and shadows to a redemptive act which had not yet taken place. Those who enter into “New Testament salvation,” on the other hand, look back to a single historical event: the death and resurrection of Jesus. Their salvation is complete.

 

There are two requirements for receiving this New Testament salvation.

   

  If you confess with your mouth the Lord Jesus and believe in your heart that God has raised Him from the dead, you will be saved (Rom. 10:9).

   

  The two requirements are to confess Jesus as Lord and to believe that God raised Him from the dead. Prior to resurrection Sunday the apostles had already confessed Jesus as Lord. But now, for the first time, they also believed that God raised Him from the dead. Thus their salvation was completed.

 

This was the point at which they experienced the new birth. The Holy Spirit, breathed into them by Jesus, imparted to them a totally new kind of life – eternal life – which had triumphed over sin and Satan, over death and the grave.

 

This experience of the apostles stands as a pattern for all who enter into the new birth. It contains two essential elements: a direct, personal revelation of the resurrected Jesus and the receiving of the Holy Spirit as divine, eternal life. This agrees with the words of Paul, “the Spirit is life because of righteousness”; that is, the righteousness imputed to all who believe in Jesus’s death and resurrection (Rom. 8:10).

 

Yet even after this wonderful encounter Jesus made it plain to the apostles that their experience of the Holy Spirit was still incomplete. In His final words to them before His ascension He commanded them not to go out and preach immediately, but to go back to Jerusalem and wait there until they were baptised in the Holy Spirit and thus endued with power from on high for effective witness and service.

   

  Behold, I send the Promise of My Father upon you; but tarry in the city of Jerusalem until you are endued with power from on high (Luke 24:49).

   

  For John truly baptised with water, but you shall be baptised with the Holy Spirit not many days from now (Acts 1:5).

   

  But you shall receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you; and you shall be witnesses to Me (Acts 1:8).

   

  Almost all interpreters of the Bible agree that this promise of being baptised in the Holy Spirit was fulfilled on Pentecost Sunday.

   

  And they were all filled with the Holy Spirit and began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance (Acts 2:4).

   

  It was on resurrection Sunday that the apostles received the inbreathed Spirit from Jesus and thus entered into salvation and the new birth. Yet it was not until Pentecost Sunday, seven weeks later, that they were baptised in – or filled with – the Holy Spirit. This shows that salvation, or the new birth, is a distinct and separate experience from the baptism in the Holy Spirit, although each is described as “receiving the Holy Spirit.”

 

Later on Pentecost Sunday Peter explained that it was Jesus, after His ascension, who had poured out the Holy Spirit on the waiting disciples.

   

  Therefore being exalted to the right hand of God, and having received from the Father the promise of the Holy Spirit, He poured out this which you now see and hear (Acts 2:33).

   

  We can then sum up the differences between the two experiences of receiving the Holy Spirit.

  On resurrection Sunday it was:

   

  • the resurrected Jesus

  • the inbreathed Spirit

  • the result: life.

   

  On Pentecost Sunday it was:

   

  • the ascended Jesus

  • the outpoured Spirit

  • the result: power.

   

  The experience of the apostles demonstrates that salvation, or the new birth, and the baptism in the Holy Spirit are two distinct and separate experiences. The apostles received the first of these experiences on resurrection Sunday; the second, seven weeks later on Pentecost Sunday.

 

Further study in the book of Acts discloses that the two experiences are normally separate. Furthermore, from Pentecost Sunday onward the term “to receive the Holy Spirit” is applied always and only to the second experience – the baptism in the Holy Spirit. It is never again used to describe the new birth.

   

 

Further Outpourings of the Spirit

  There are three other occasions subsequent to Pentecost where Scripture describes what took place when people were baptised in the Holy Spirit. These were in Samaria, in Ephesus and in the household of Cornelius. We will examine each of these in turn.

 

The ministry of Philip in Samaria is introduced in Acts 8:5.

   

  Then Philip went down to the city of Samaria and preached Jesus to them.

   

  But when they believed Philip as he preached the things concerning the kingdom of God and the name of Jesus Jesus, both men and women were baptised (Acts 8:12).

   

  These people had now heard the truth of Jesus preached to them by Philip; they had believed; they had been baptised. It would be unreasonable and unscriptural to deny that these people were saved.

 

Consider the words of Jesus as He commissioned His disciples to preach the gospel.

   

  And He said to them, “Go into all the world and preach the gospel to every creature. He who believes and is baptised will be saved: but he who does not believe will be condemned” (Mark 16:15-16).

   

  The people of Samaria had heard the gospel preached, they had believed, and they had been baptised. Therefore we know, on the authority of Jesus’s own words, that they were saved. Yet these same people up to this time had not received the Holy Spirit.

   

  Now when the apostles who were at Jerusalem heard that Samaria had received the word of God, they sent Peter and John to them, who, when they had come down, prayed for them that they might receive the Holy Spirit. For as yet He had fallen upon none of them. They had only been baptised in the name of the Lord Jesus. Then they laid hands on them, and they received the Holy Spirit (Acts 8:14-17).

   

  We see that the people of Samaria received salvation through the ministry of Philip; they received the Holy Spirit through the ministry of Peter and John. They’re receiving the Holy Spirit was a separate experience, subsequent to their receiving salvation. Here, then, is a second scriptural example which indicates it is possible for people to have become genuine  professing Christian’s but not yet to have received the Holy Spirit in the sense in which this phrase is used from Pentecost onward.

 

It is interesting to notice that, in the passage in Acts 8, we find two different forms of speech used. One speaks of “receiving the Holy Spirit”; the other speaks of “the Holy Spirit falling upon them.” However, the context makes it plain that these are not two different experiences but two different aspects of one and the same experience.

 

When Paul came to Ephesus and met there certain people described as “disciples,” the first question he asked was “Did you receive the Holy Spirit when you believed?” (Acts 19:2).

 

It is plain that Paul had been given the impression that these people were disciples of Jesus. Obviously, if they were not  professing Christian’s at all, there could have been no question of their having received the Holy Spirit, since this is received only through faith in Jesus. However, by further questioning Paul discovered they were not disciples of Jesus at all but only of John the Baptist, and so he preached to them the full gospel of Jesus.

 

One fact emerges clearly from this incident so far. Obviously, if people always received the Holy Spirit automatically as an immediate consequence of believing in Jesus, it would be illogical and foolish for Paul to ask the question: “Did you receive the Holy Spirit when you believed?” The mere fact that Paul asked this question makes it clear that he recognized the possibility of people having become disciples or believers in Jesus without having received the Holy Spirit.

 

This is confirmed by the record of events that occurred after Paul had explained the gospel of Jesus to these people.

   

  When they heard this, they were baptised in the name of the Lord Jesus (Acts 19:5).

   

  These people had now heard and believed the gospel, and they had been baptised. As we have already shown in connection with the people of Samaria, on the authority of Jesus’s own words, people who have fulfilled the two conditions of believing and being baptised are thereby saved. Nevertheless, these people in Ephesus, just like those in Samaria, had not yet received the Holy Spirit. In Ephesus, just as in Samaria, this came as a separate and subsequent experience.

   

  And when Paul had laid hands on them, the Holy Spirit came upon them, and they spoke with tongues and prophesied (Acts 19:6).

   

  Here, then, is a third scriptural example which indicates it is possible for people to have been converted to Jesus, but not yet to have received the Holy Spirit.

 

This conclusion drawn from the book of Acts is further confirmed by what Paul says in his epistle to the Ephesians. We must bear in mind that this group of disciples to whom Paul ministered in Ephesus were among the Ephesian  professing Christian’s to whom he later wrote his epistle.

In his letter Paul reminds these people of the successive stages in which they were originally converted and received the Holy Spirit. Speaking of their coming to believe in Jesus, he says:

   

  In Him you also trusted, after you heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation; in whom also, having believed, you were sealed with the Holy Spirit of promise (Eph. 1:13).

   

  Here Paul indicates that there were three separate, successive stages in their experience: 

  1. they heard the gospel; 
  2. they believed in Jesus; 
  3. they were sealed with the Holy Spirit. 

This agrees exactly with the historical record in Acts 19, which states that these people first heard the gospel, then believed and were baptised. Finally, when Paul laid his hands upon them, the Holy Spirit came on them.

 

In both accounts alike – in Acts and in Ephesians – it is absolutely clear that the people received the Holy Spirit, not simultaneously with conversion, but as a separate and subsequent experience after conversion.

 

For a fourth example, of a different kind, we shall now consider briefly the sermon Peter preached in the house of Cornelius and its results (see Acts 10:34-48).

 

The Scripture seems to indicate that as soon as Cornelius and his household heard the gospel and put their faith in Jesus, they immediately received the Holy Spirit and spoke with tongues. However, we must add that, although in this instance these two experiences happened together, they still remain two quite distinct experiences.

 

Furthermore, the evidence that Cornelius and his household had received the Holy Spirit was not the fact that they had put their faith in Jesus, but the fact that, under the impulse of the Holy Spirit, they spoke with tongues.

 

In the account of what happened in the household of Cornelius, the following three different phrases are all used to describe the same experience: 

“the Holy Spirit fell upon” them; “the gift of the Holy Spirit had been poured out on” them; and they “received the Holy Spirit.” Where Peter describes the same incident a second time, he uses the following three phrases: “the Holy Spirit fell upon them”; they were “baptised with [in] the Holy Spirit”; “God gave them the same gift [of the Holy Spirit]” (Acts 11:15-17).

 

Earlier, two similar phrases were used concerning the Samaritans: the Holy Spirit “had fallen upon none of them”; and “they received the Holy Spirit” (Acts 8:16-17).

 

Putting these passages together, we find that a total of five different phrases are used to describe this one experience: “the Holy Spirit fell upon” them; “the gift of the Holy Spirit had been poured out on” them; they “received the Holy Spirit”; they were “baptised with [in] the Holy Spirit”; and “God gave them the gift” of the Holy Spirit.

 

Some modern interpreters would suggest that these different phrases refer to different experiences. However, this is not in line with the usage of the apostles in the New Testament. According to the apostles, these different phrases all denote one single experience – although they describe it from different aspects. It is the same thing for a person to receive the Holy Spirit or receive the gift of the Holy Spirit as it is to be baptised in the Holy Spirit, or for the Holy Spirit to fall upon that person, or for the Holy Spirit to be poured out on that person.

 

We have now carefully considered four different groups of people portrayed in the New Testament: 

  1. the apostles, 
  2. the people of Samaria, 
  3. the disciples at Ephesus, 
  4. Cornelius and his household. 

Of these four groups, we have seen clearly that the first three – the apostles, the people of Samaria, the disciples at Ephesus – had all been converted before they received the Holy Spirit. They’re receiving the Holy Spirit was a separate and subsequent experience following their conversion.

 

There is no other instance recorded, apart from Cornelius and his household, in which people received the Holy Spirit at the same time they believed in Jesus. We are therefore justified in concluding that the experience of Cornelius and his household is the exception rather than the rule.

  On the basis of this careful examination of the New Testament record, we may now set forth the following conclusions.

   

  1. It is normal for a Christian’s to receive the Holy Spirit as a separate and subsequent experience, following conversion.

  2. Even if a person receives the Holy Spirit at conversion, receiving the Holy Spirit still remains, logically, a distinct experience from being converted.

  3. Whether a person receives the Holy Spirit at conversion or after conversion, the evidence that that person has received the Holy Spirit still remains the same: The person speaks with tongues as the Holy Spirit gives utterance.

  4. The fact that a person has been genuinely converted does not by itself constitute evidence that that person has received the Holy Spirit.

   

 

The Teaching of Jesus

This conclusion concerning the relationship between conversion and receiving the Holy Spirit has been based mainly on a study of the book of Acts. However, it is in full accord with the teaching of Jesus Himself in the Gospels. Jesus told His disciples:

   

  If you then, being evil, know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more will your heavenly Father give the Holy Spirit to those who ask Him! (Luke 11:13).

   

  The teaching of this verse – reinforced by the examples which precede it, of a son asking his father for bread, for a fish and for an egg – is that God, as a heavenly Father, is willing to give the Holy Spirit to His believing children if they will ask for it. However, a person must first put his faith in Jesus to become a child of God.

 

Plainly, therefore, Jesus teaches not that the Holy Spirit is received at conversion, but rather that it is a gift which every converted believer has a right to ask for, as a child from his or her Father. Furthermore, Jesus definitely places an obligation upon the children of God to ask their heavenly Father specifically for this gift of the Holy Spirit. It is therefore not scriptural for a Christian’s to assume, or to assert, that he automatically received the gift of the Holy Spirit at conversion without asking for it.

 

Again, in John 7:38 Jesus says:

   

  He who believes in Me, as the Scripture has said, out of his heart will flow rivers of living water.

   

  In the first half of the next verse these “rivers of living water” are interpreted by the writer of the Gospel as referring to the Holy Spirit, for he says:

   

  But this He spoke concerning the Spirit, whom those believing in Him would receive (John 7:39).

   

  In both these verses it is clear that the gift of the Holy Spirit, bringing forth rivers of living water from within, is to be received by those who are already believers in Jesus. It is something which they should go on to receive after believing in Jesus.

 

Jesus teaches the same truth again in John 14:15-17, where He says:

   

  If you love Me, keep My commandments. And I will pray the Father, and He will give you another Helper, that He may abide with you forever, even the Spirit of truth, whom the world cannot receive, because it neither sees Him nor knows Him; but you know Him, for He dwells with you and will be in you.

   

  In this passage the Helper and the Spirit of truth are two different designations of the Holy Spirit. Jesus teaches here that the gift of the Holy Spirit is not for the unbelieving people of this world, but for Jesus’s own disciples who love and obey Him. This confirms, therefore, that it is the privilege of God’s believing children, Jesus’s disciples, to go on to receive the gift of the Holy Spirit as they meet God’s conditions. These may be summed up in one all-important requirement: loving obedience to Jesus.

The Baptism In The Holy Ghost

The Baptism in the Holy Spirit

The Baptism in the Holy Spirit

  Since the turn of the twentieth century, the subject of the baptism in the Holy Spirit has been arousing keen interest and discussion among ever-widening circles of the Christian’s church. Today it continues to be a theme of study, of discussion and quite often of controversy in almost all sections of Jesusdom. In view of this, we shall seek to approach this study in a way that is careful, thorough and scriptural.

   Eight New Testament References

  First we shall enumerate the passages in the New Testament where the word baptise is used in connection with the Holy Spirit. Appropriately enough – since seven is distinctively the number of the Holy Spirit – there are seven such passages.

  John the Baptist contrasted his own ministry with the ministry of Jesus which was to follow.

   I indeed baptise you with water unto [into] repentance, but He who is coming after me is mightier than I, whose sandals I am not worthy to carry. He will baptise you with the Holy Spirit and fire (Matt. 3:11).

   Although the New King James Version uses the English preposition with in conjunction with the verb phrase “to baptise,” the actual preposition used in the original Greek is in. This usage applies equally to baptising in water and to baptising in the Holy Spirit. In each case the Greek preposition used is in. In fact, the only prepositions ever used anywhere in the New Testament in conjunction with the verb phrase “to baptise” are in and into. It is unfortunate that the New King James Version, by using a variety of different prepositional forms, has obscured the clear teaching of the original text.

  In Mark 1:8 the words of John the Baptist concerning Jesus are rendered as follows.

   I indeed baptised you with water, but He will baptise you with the Holy Spirit.

   In each case the Greek preposition used is in. In Luke 3:16 the words of John the Baptist are rendered as follows.

   John answered, saying to them all, “I indeed baptise you with water; but One mightier than I is coming, whose sandal strap I am not worthy to loose. He will baptise you with the Holy Spirit and with fire.”

   Here again, the literal translation is “in the Holy Spirit.”

  In John 1:33 the testimony of John the Baptist concerning Jesus is given as follows.

   I did not know Him, but He who sent me to baptise with water said to me, “Upon whom you see the Spirit descending, and remaining on Him, this is He who baptises with the Holy Spirit.”

   

  Again, in each case the Greek preposition used is in.

  In Acts 1:5, shortly before His ascension into heaven, Jesus says to His disciples:

   

  For John truly baptised with water, but you shall be baptised with the Holy Spirit not many days from now.

   

  More literally, Jesus says, “You shall be baptised in the Holy Spirit.”

 

In Acts 11:16 Peter is describing the events which took place in the household of Cornelius. In this connection he quotes the actual words of Jesus as given in Acts 1:5, for he says:

   

  Then I remembered the word of the Lord, how He said, “John indeed baptised with water, but you shall be baptised with [in] the Holy Spirit.”

   

  Finally, in 1 Corinthians 12:13 Paul says:

   

  For by one Spirit we were all baptised into one body – whether Jews or Greeks, whether slaves or free – and have all been made to drink into one Spirit.

   

  Here the New King James Version used the preposition by – “by one Spirit we were all baptised into one body.” However, the preposition used in the original Greek text is in – “in one Spirit we were all baptised into one body.” Thus, Paul’s wording in this passage is in perfect harmony with the wording of the Gospels and the book of Acts.

 

Unfortunately, the accident that the translators of the King James Versions – both Old and New – have used the phrase “by one Spirit” in this particular passage has given rise to some strange doctrines. It has been suggested that Paul is referring to some special experience, different from that referred to in the Gospels or the book of Acts, and that the Holy Spirit is Himself the agent who does the baptising. Had the authors of these doctrines paused long enough to consult the original Greek text, they would have found no basis there for any such doctrine. In fact, the whole teaching of the entire New Testament agrees on this fact, clearly and emphatically stated: Jesus Jesus alone – and no other – is the One who baptises in the Holy Spirit.

 

We must also add that Paul’s usage here of the phrase “baptised into,” in connection with the baptism in the Holy Spirit, agrees with the usage of the same phrase in connection with John’s baptism and with Christian’s baptism in water. In both these cases we pointed out that the act of baptism was an outward seal and affirmation of an inward spiritual condition. The same applies to Paul’s statement here about the relationship between the baptism in the Holy Spirit and membership of the body of Jesus. The baptism in the Holy Spirit does not make a person a member of the body of Jesus. Rather it is a supernatural seal acknowledging that that person has already, by faith, become a member of Jesus’s body.

 

Let us now briefly summarize the lessons we may learn from the seven New Testament passages where the phrase “to baptise in the Holy Spirit” is used.

 

In six out of these seven passages the experience of being baptised in the Holy Spirit is both compared and contrasted with being baptised in water.

 

In two out of the seven passages “fire” is joined with “the Holy Spirit,” and the experience is described as “being baptised in the Holy Spirit and fire.”

 

Apart from the verb phrase “to baptise,” the only other verb used in these passages in connection with the Holy Spirit is the verb “to drink.” In 1 Corinthians 12:13 Paul says: “We . . . have all been made to drink into one Spirit.” In modern English we would say more simply: “We have all been given to drink of one Spirit.”

 

The use of the verb “to drink” agrees with what Jesus Himself says concerning the Holy Spirit in John 7:37-39.

   

  Jesus stood and cried out, saying, “If anyone thirsts, let him come to Me and drink. He who believes in Me, as the Scripture has said, out of his heart will flow rivers of living water.” But this He spoke concerning the Spirit, whom those believing in Him would receive; for the Holy Spirit was not yet given, because Jesus was not yet glorified.

   

  Here Jesus likens the gift of the Holy Spirit to the drinking of water.

 

This in turn harmonizes with the passage in Acts 2:4 concerning the disciples in the upper room on the day of Pentecost, where it states that they were all filled with the Holy Spirit.

 

It agrees also with various passages in the book of Acts which speak about believers receiving the Holy Spirit. For example, concerning the Samaritans converted through the preaching of Philip, we read that Peter and John were later sent down to them from Jerusalem.

   

  Who, when they had come down, prayed for them that they might receive the Holy Spirit . . . Then they laid hands on them, and they received the Holy Spirit (Acts 8:15,17).

   

  Peter says, concerning the people in the house of Cornelius upon whom the Holy Spirit had just fallen:

   

  Can anyone forbid water, that these should not be baptised who have received the Holy Spirit just as we have? (Acts 10:47).

   

  Paul asks the disciples whom he meets at Ephesus:

   

  Did you receive the Holy Spirit when you believed? (Acts 19:2).

   

  In all these passages, the use of phrases such as “to drink of the Holy Spirit,” “to be filled with the Holy Spirit” and “to receive the Holy Spirit” suggests an experience in which the believer receives the fullness of the Holy Spirit inwardly within himself.

   

Immersion From Above

We have seen that the literal, root meaning of the verb phrase “to baptise” is “to cause something to be dipped or immersed.” Thus, the phrase “to be baptised in the Holy Spirit” suggests that the believer’s whole personality is immersed, surrounded and enveloped in the presence and power of the Holy Spirit, coming down over him from above and from without.

 

We need to bear in mind that, in the natural order, there are two possible ways of being immersed in water. A person may go down beneath the surface of the water and come up from under it. Or a person may walk under a waterfall and allow himself to be immersed from above. This second form of immersion is the spiritual counterpart of the baptism in the Holy Spirit.

 

Without exception, in every place in the book of Acts where the baptism in the Holy Spirit is described, language is used which indicates that the Holy Spirit comes down over, or is poured out upon, the believer from above. For example, on the day of Pentecost:

   

  There came a sound from heaven, as of a rushing wind, and it filled the whole house where they were sitting (Acts 2:2).

   

  These words reveal that the Holy Spirit came down over these disciples from above and completely immersed and enveloped them, even to the extent of filling the whole house where they were sitting (Acts 2:2).

 

Later Peter twice confirms this interpretation of the experience. First he declares that this experience is the fulfillment of God’s promise.

   

  In the last days . . . I will pour out of My Spirit on all flesh (Acts 2:17).

   

  And he says again concerning Jesus:

   

  Therefore being exalted to the right hand of God, and having received from the Father the promise of the Holy Spirit, He poured out this which you now see and hear (Acts 2:33).

   

  In each case the picture is one of the Holy Spirit being poured out over the believers from above.

 

In Acts 8:16 the phrase used for the same experience is that of the Holy Spirit “falling upon” the believers. Here again the language depicts the Spirit coming down over them from above.

 

In Acts 10, concerning the people in the house of Cornelius, both phrases are used one after the other. In verse 44 we read: “the Holy Spirit fell upon all those who heard the word.” In verse 45 we read: “the gift of the Holy Spirit had been poured out on the Gentiles also.” This shows that the phrases “to fall upon” and “to be poured out on” are used interchangeably in this connection.

 

Again, when Peter describes the same event in the house of Cornelius, he says:

   

  The Holy Spirit fell upon them, as upon us at the beginning (Acts 11:15).

   

  Here the phrase “as upon us at the beginning” indicates that the experience of Cornelius and his household was exactly parallel to the experience of the disciples in the upper room on the day of Pentecost.

 

Finally, we read concerning the disciples in Ephesus, after they had been baptised in water:

   

  And when Paul had laid hands on them, the Holy Spirit came upon them (Acts 19:6).

   

  Here the phrase “to come upon” is obviously similar in meaning to the phrase used in previous passages, “to fall upon.”

 

If we now seek to fit together the pictures created by the various phrases used in the New Testament, we arrive at a conclusion which may be summarized as follows.

   

  • The experience of which we are speaking is made up of two distinct but complementary aspects, one outward and the other inward.

  • Outwardly, the invisible presence and power of the Holy Spirit comes down from above upon the be liever and surrounds, envelops and immerses him.

  • Inwardly, the believer, in the likeness of one drinking, receives the presence and power of the Holy Spirit within himself until there comes a point at which the Holy Spirit, thus  received, in turn wells up within the believer and flows forth like a river from the inmost depths of his being.

   

  No human language can fully describe a mighty, supernatural experience such as this, but it may perhaps be illuminating to borrow a picture from the Old Testament.

 

In the days of Noah the whole world was submerged beneath the flood. In bringing about this flood, God used two distinct but complementary processes.

   

  In the six-hundredth year of Noah’s life, in the second month, the seventeenth day of the month, on that day all the fountains of the great deep were broken up, and the windows of heaven were opened (Gen. 7:11).

   

  This account reveals that the waters of the flood came from two sources: from within (“the fountains of the great deep were broken up”) and from above (“the windows of heaven were opened”), and the rain was poured down.

 

We must, of course, observe that the flood of Noah’s day was a flood of divine wrath and judgement; the flood which immerses the New Testament believer is one of divine mercy and glory and blessing. However, with this qualification, the New Testament believer who receives the fullness of the Holy Spirit exhibits the same two aspects as in the account of Noah’s flood: From within, the fountains of the great deep within the believer’s own personality are broken up, and there gushes out a mighty flood of blessing and power from his inmost being; from above, the windows of God’s mercy are opened upon the believer, and there is poured upon him such a deluge of glory and blessing that his whole personality is immersed in its outpourings.

 

It must be emphasized that we are not speaking of two separate experiences, but rather of two distinct yet complementary aspects which together make up the fullness of one single experience.

 

Someone may object that it is difficult to understand how the believer can at one and the same time be filled with the Holy Spirit from within and immersed in the Holy Spirit from without. However, such an objection in reality serves only to illustrate the limitations of human speech and understanding. A similar type of objection might be brought against such statements as those made by Jesus Himself, that He is in the Father, and the Father in Him; or again, that Jesus is in the believer, and the believer in Jesus.

 

In the last resort, if men persist in caviling at a supernatural experience of this kind on the basis of human limitations of expression or understanding, the best and shortest answer is found in the words of the Scottish preacher who said, “It’s better felt than telt!”

   

 

The Outward Evidence

  Up to this point we have considered the invisible, inward nature of the baptism in the Holy Spirit. We must now go on to consider the outward manifestations which accompany this inward experience.

 

First of all we must point out that it is perfectly scriptural to use the word manifestation in connection with the Holy Spirit. We acknowledge, of course, that the Holy Spirit Himself is, by His very nature, invisible. In this respect He is compared by Jesus to the wind. Jesus says concerning the operation of the Holy Spirit:

   

  The wind blows where it wishes, and you hear the sound of it, but cannot tell where it comes from and where it goes. So is everyone who is born of the Spirit (John 3:8).

   

  Although the wind itself is invisible, the effects which the wind produces when it blows can in many cases be both seen and heard. For example, when the wind blows, the dust rises from the streets; the trees all bend in one direction; the leaves rustle; the waves of the sea roar; the clouds blow across the sky. These effects produced by the wind can be seen or heard.

 

So it is, Jesus says, with the Holy Spirit. The Spirit Himself is invisible. But the effects which the Holy Spirit produces when He begins to work can often be seen or heard. This fact is confirmed by the language of the New Testament in various places.

 

For example, let us turn to Peter’s description of the effects produced by the descent of the Holy Spirit on the day of Pentecost.

   

  Therefore being exalted to the right hand of God, and having received from the Father the promise of the Holy Spirit, He [Jesus] poured out this which you now see and hear (Acts 2:33).

   

  The effects of the descent of the Holy Spirit could be both seen and heard.

  Paul describes the work of the Spirit in his own ministry in these words:

   

  And my speech and my preaching were not with persuasive words of human wisdom, but in demonstration of the Spirit and of power (1 Cor. 2:4).

   

  He also says that the Spirit can have a similar effect in every believer’s experience.

   

  But the manifestation of the Spirit is given to each one for the profit of all (1 Cor. 12:7).

   

  Notice the phrases which Paul uses in connection with the Holy Spirit – the “demonstration of the Spirit” and the “manifestation of the Spirit.” These two words, demonstration and manifestation, show clearly that the presence and operation of the Holy Spirit can produce effects which can be perceived by our physical senses.

 

With this in mind, let us now turn to the various passages in the New Testament where the baptism in the Holy Spirit is described; that is, where we are told what actually happened to the people who received this experience. Let us see what the outward manifestations are which accompany this operation of the Spirit.

 

Three places in the New Testament we are told what happened when people were baptised in the Holy Spirit. We shall consider, in order, the actual words used in each report to describe what took place.

 

First, let us read what happened to the first disciples on the day of Pentecost.

   

  And suddenly there came a sound from heaven, as of a rushing mighty wind, and it filled the whole house where they were sitting. Then there appeared to them divided tongues, as of fire, and one sat upon each of them. And they were all filled with the Holy Spirit and began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance (Acts 2:2-4).

   

  Second, we turn to what happened when Peter first preached the gospel to Cornelius and his household.

   

  While Peter was still speaking these words, the Holy Spirit fell upon all those who heard the word. And those of the circumcision who believed were astonished, as many as came with Peter, because the gift of the Holy Spirit had been poured out on the Gentiles also. For they heard them speak with tongues and magnify God (Acts 10:44-46).

   

  Thirdly, we see what happened to the first group of converts to whom Paul preached at Ephesus.

   

  And when Paul had laid hands on them, the Holy Spirit came upon them, and they spoke with tongues and prophesied (Acts 19:6).

   

  If we now carefully compare these three passages, we shall find that there is one – and only one – outward manifestation which is common to all three occasions where people received the baptism in the Holy Spirit. In each case the Scripture explicitly states that those who received this experience “spoke with tongues,” or “spoke with other tongues.”

 

Other supernatural manifestations are also mentioned, but none is mentioned as having taken place on more than one of the three occasions.

 

For example, on the day of Pentecost the sound of a rushing wind was heard, and visible tongues of fire were seen. However, these manifestations were not repeated on the other two occasions.

 

Again, at Ephesus the new converts not only spoke in tongues but also prophesied. However, this manifestation of prophesying is not mentioned as having taken place either on the day of Pentecost or in the house of Cornelius.

 

The only manifestation which is common to all three occasions is that all those who received the experience spoke with tongues.

 

Peter and the other Jews who already knew what had taken place on the day of Pentecost went to the house of Cornelius reluctantly, against their own inclinations, under the explicit direction of God. At that time the Jewish believers did not realise the gospel was for the Gentiles or that Gentiles could be saved and become  professing Christian’s. However, the moment Peter and the other Jews heard the Gentiles speak with tongues, they immediately understood and acknowledged that these Gentiles had received the Holy Spirit just as fully as the Jews themselves. They never asked for any additional evidence.

 

The Scripture says that they were “astonished . . . because the gift of the Holy Spirit had been poured out on the Gentiles also. For they heard them speak with tongues” (Acts 10:45-46). For Peter and the other Jews, the sole and sufficient evidence that the Gentiles had received the Holy Spirit was that they spoke with tongues.

 

In Acts 11 Peter was called to account by the other leaders of the church in Jerusalem for visiting and preaching to Gentiles. In his own defense he explained what had taken place in the house of Cornelius.

   

  And as I began to speak, the Holy Spirit fell upon them, as upon us at the beginning (Acts 11:15).

   

  Thus Peter directly compares the experience which the household of Cornelius received with that which the first disciples received on the day of Pentecost, for he says, “. . . as upon us at the beginning.” Yet in the house of Cornelius there was no mention of a mighty rushing wind or tongues of fire. The one sufficient manifestation which set the divine seal upon the experience of Cornelius and his household was that they spoke with tongues.

 

From this we conclude that the manifestation of speaking with tongues as the Holy Spirit gives utterance is the accepted New Testament evidence that a person has received the baptism in the Holy Spirit. In confirmation of this conclusion, we may make the following statements.

   

  1. This was the evidence which the apostles themselves received in their own experience.

  2. This was the evidence which the apostles accepted in the experience of others.

  3. The apostles never asked for any other alternative evidence.

  4. No other alternative evidence is offered to us anywhere in the New Testament.   

  In the next session we will examine this conclusion further, and we shall consider various criticisms or objections which are commonly raised against it.

Spiritual Significance of Christian’s Baptism

Spiritual Significance of Christian’s Baptism

   

  In this session we shall complete our examination of Christian’s baptism by unfolding, from the teaching of the New Testament, the spiritual significance of this ordinance.

 

How God’s Grace Operates

  The key text which unlocks this truth is found in Romans 6:1-7:

   

  What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin that grace may abound? Certainly not! How shall we who died to sin live any longer in it? Or do you not know that as many of us as were baptised into Jesus Jesus were baptised into His death? Therefore we were buried with Him through baptism into death, that just as Jesus was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life. For if we have been united together in the likeness of His death, certainly we also shall be in the likeness of His resurrection, knowing this, that our old man was crucified with Him, that the body of sin might be done away with, that we should no longer be slaves of sin. For he who has died has been freed from sin (6:1-7).

   

  In Romans 5 Paul emphasized the abundance of God’s grace toward the depths of man’s sin.

   

  But where sin abounded, grace abounded much more (v. 20).

   

  This leads to the question Paul asks in Romans 6:1: “What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin that grace may abound?” In other words, Paul imagines someone asking: “If God’s grace is in proportion to man’s sin, abounding most where sin abounds most, shall we deliberately go on sinning that God’s grace may abound toward us all the more? Is this the way to avail ourselves of God’s grace toward sinners?”

 

Paul’s answer to this dangerous suggestion points out that it is based on a complete misunderstanding of how God’s grace operates. In order for a sinner to avail himself of God’s grace there must be a definite, personal transaction by faith between the sinner and God. The nature of this transaction is such that it produces a total transformation within the personality of the sinner.

 

There are two opposite, but mutually complementary, sides to this transformation produced by God’s grace in the sinner’s personality. First there is a death – a death to sin and the old life. Then there is a new life – a life lived to God and to righteousness.

 

In the light of this fact about the way in which God’s grace operates in the sinner and the results which it produces, we are faced with two alternative, mutually exclusive possibilities: If we have availed ourselves of God’s grace, we are dead to sin; on the other hand, if we are not dead to sin, then we have not availed ourselves of God’s grace. It is therefore illogical, and impossible, to speak of availing ourselves of God’s grace and at the same time be living in sin. These two things can never go together. Paul points this out in Romans 6:2: “Certainly not! How shall we who died to sin live any longer in it?”

 

Just what are we to understand by the phrase “died to sin”? To form a picture of this, let us imagine a man who has been an outstanding sinner. Let us suppose he has been brutal to his wife and children; he has forbidden all mention of God or religion in his home; he has used foul language; and he has been a slave of alcohol and tobacco.

Now let us suppose that this man dies suddenly of a heart attack, sitting in his chair at home. On the table by him is a lighted cigarette and a glass of whiskey. Neither cigarette nor whisky any longer produces any reaction from the man; there is no inward stirring of desire, no outward motion of his arm toward them. Why not? The man is dead – dead to alcohol and tobacco alike.

  A little later his wife and children come back from Sunday evening service at the local Gospel Tabernacle, singing the new gospel choruses they have just learned. There is no reaction from the man – no anger, no blasphemous words. Why not? The man is dead – dead to anger and blasphemy alike. In one short phrase, that man is “dead to sin.” Sin no longer has any attraction for him; sin no longer produces any reaction from him; sin no longer has any power over him.

 

This is the picture that the New Testament paints of the man who has availed himself, by faith, of God’s grace. Through the operation of that grace, the man has become dead to sin. Sin no longer has any attraction for him; sin no longer produces any reaction from him; sin no longer has any power over him. Instead, he is alive to God and to righteousness.

   

Crucified and Resurrected With Jesus

This fact, that the true Christian’s believer is, through God’s grace, dead to sin, is stated repeatedly throughout the New Testament.

   

  Knowing this, that our old man was crucified with Him [Jesus], that the body of sin might be done away with, that we should no longer be slaves of sin. For he who has died has been freed [or justified] from sin (Rom. 6:6-7).

   

  The meaning here is plain: For each person who has accepted the atoning death of Jesus on his behalf, the old man – the corrupt, sinful nature – is crucified; the body of sin has been done away with; through death, that person has been freed (or justified) from sin. There is no longer any need to be the slave of sin.

 

A little later in the same chapter Paul repeats this teaching with renewed emphasis.

   

  Likewise you also, reckon yourselves to be dead indeed to sin, but alive to God in Jesus Jesus our Lord. Therefore do not let sin reign in your mortal body, that you should obey it in its lusts . . . For sin shall not have dominion over you, for you are not under law but under grace (Rom. 6:11-12,14).

   

  Again, the meaning is plain: As  professing Christian’s we are to reckon ourselves as dead to sin through the grace of God in Jesus Jesus. As a result, there is no reason why sin should continue to exercise any control or dominion over us. Later in Romans Paul again states the same truth in the clearest and most emphatic way.

   

  And if Jesus is in you, the body is dead because of sin, but the Spirit is life because of righteousness (Rom. 8:10).

   

  The words Paul uses, “if Jesus is in you,” indicate that this truth applies to every true Christian’s believer in whose heart Jesus dwells by faith. The double consequence of Jesus’s indwelling the believer is: 1) a death of the old carnal nature; “the body,” that is, the body of sin, is dead; 2) a new life to righteousness through the operation of God’s Spirit – the Spirit is life because of righteousness.

 

Peter presents the same truth with equal clarity. Speaking of the purpose of Jesus’s death upon the cross, he says:

   

  Who Himself bore our sins in His own body on the tree, that we, having died to sins, might live for righteousness – by whose stripes you were healed (1 Pet. 2:24).

   

  Peter also presents the two complementary aspects of the transformation that takes place within the believer who accepts the atoning death of Jesus on his behalf: 1) death to sins, 2) living for righteousness. In fact, Peter states this as being the supreme purpose of Jesus’s death on the cross: “that we, having died to sins, might live for righteousness.”

 

The condition of being dead to sins and living to righteousness is something far beyond the mere forgiveness of past sins. In fact, it takes the believer into an altogether different realm of spiritual experience. The majority of professing  professing Christian’s in almost all denominations have some kind of belief that their past sins can be forgiven. In fact, this is probably the main reason why they attend church – for the purpose of confessing and obtaining forgiveness for the sins they have committed.

 

However, they have no thought or expectation of experiencing any inward transformation of their own nature. The result is that, having confessed their sins, they leave the church unchanged and continue committing the same kind of sins they have been confessing. In due course they are back in church again, confessing the same sins.

 

This is a man-made religion on the human level to which some of the outward forms of Christianity have been attached. It has little or nothing in common with the salvation God offers to the true believer through faith in Jesus’s atonement.

 

God’s central purpose in Jesus’s atonement was not simply that man should be able to receive forgiveness of his past sinful acts, but rather that, once having been forgiven for the past, he should be able to enter into a new realm of spiritual experience. Henceforth he should be dead to sins but alive to God and to righteousness; he should no longer be the slave of sin; sin should no longer have any dominion over him.

 

This has been made possible because Jesus, in His atonement, not merely took upon Himself the guilt of our sinful acts and then paid the full penalty for all those acts. Above and beyond this, Jesus made Himself one with our corrupt, fallen, sinful nature; and when He died upon the cross, according to Scripture, that old nature of ours – “our old man,” “the body of sin” – died in Him and with Him.

 

For the believer to enter into this full purpose of Jesus’s atonement, two conditions must be fulfilled. These two conditions are stated by Paul, in their logical order, in Romans 6.

   

  Knowing this, that our old man was crucified with Him, that the body of sin might be done away with, that we should no longer be slaves of sin (Rom. 6:6).

   

  Our old man being crucified with Jesus was a definite, historical event that occurred at a given moment in past time.

  Likewise you also, reckon yourselves to be dead indeed to sin, but alive to God in Jesus Jesus our Lord (Rom. 6:11).

   

  Here the introductory word likewise points out the correspondence between the experience of Jesus and the experience of the believer. The meaning is: “Just as Jesus died, so reckon that you also died with Him.” More briefly, “Jesus’s death was your death.”

 

Here, then, are the two conditions for being dead to sin and living to righteousness and to God: 

  1. knowing, 
  2. reckoning. 

First, we must know what God’s Word teaches about the central purpose of Jesus’s death. Second, we must reckon God’s Word to be true in our own particular case; we must apply this truth of God’s Word by faith to our own condition. The experience can be ours only when, and only as long as, we thus know and reckon as true what God’s Word teaches about the purpose of Jesus’s atonement.

 

Concerning this central purpose of Jesus’s atonement – “that we, having died to sins, might live for righteousness” – we may make two statements which can scarcely be challenged: 1) There is no truth of greater practical importance in the whole New Testament. 2) There is no truth about which greater ignorance, indifference or unbelief prevail among professing  professing Christian’s.

 

The root of this miserable condition lies in the word ignorance. With good reason we may apply to this situation the words of the Lord in Hosea 4:6: “My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge.”

 

The primary requirement stated by Paul for entering into the central purpose of Jesus’s atonement is “knowing this.” If God’s people do not know this truth, they cannot believe it; if they do not believe it, they cannot experience it. Therefore, the first great need is to bring this truth before the church and to keep it continually before the church in the clearest and most emphatic way.

   

First Burial, Then Resurrection

  What is the relationship between this central truth of Jesus’s atonement and the ordinance of Christian’s baptism? The answer to this question is simple and practical. In the natural realm, after every death there follows a burial. The same order applies also in the spiritual realm: first death, then burial. Through faith in Jesus’s atonement we reckon ourselves, according to God’s Word, to be dead with Him; we reckon our old man, the body of sin, to be dead. Thereafter, the next act appointed by God’s Word is the burial of this old man, this dead body of sin.

 

The ordinance by which we carry out this burial is the ordinance of Christian’s baptism. In every service of Christian’s baptism there are two successive stages: 

  1. a burial, 
  2. a resurrection. 

These two stages of baptism correspond to the two stages of the inner transformation within the believer who accepts Jesus’s atonement on his behalf: 

  1. the death to sin,
  2. the new life to righteousness and to God.

 

Christian’s baptism in water is, first, a burial in a typical grave of water and, second, a resurrection out of that grave into a new life that is lived to God and to righteousness. The burial is the outward expression of the death to sin, the death of the old man; the resurrection is the outward expression of the new life to righteousness and to God. The New Testament declares this to be the purpose of Christian’s baptism.

   

  Or do you not know that as many of us as were baptised into Jesus Jesus were baptised into His death? Therefore we were buried with Him through baptism into death, that just as Jesus was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life (Rom. 6:3-4).

   

  Buried with Him in baptism, in which you also were raised with Him through faith in the working of God, who raised Him from the dead (Col. 2:12).

   

  In both these passages the two successive stages of baptism are clearly set forth: 

  1. We are buried with Jesus by baptism (literally, immersion) into His death. 
  2. 2) We are raised up with Him, through faith in the working of God’s power, to walk with Him in newness of life.

 

Apart from this basic truth of burial and resurrection, there are three other important facts about baptism contained in these verses.

 

First, by true Christian’s baptism we are baptised into Jesus Himself – not into any particular church or sect or denomination. As Paul says:

   

  For as many of you as we’re baptised into Jesus have put on Jesus (Gal. 3:27).

   

  There is no room here for anything less than Jesus: Jesus in His atoning death, and Jesus in His triumphant resurrection.

 

Second, the effect of baptism depends upon the personal faith of the one being baptised; it is through faith in the working of God – more simply, “through faith in what God does.” Without this faith, the mere ceremony of baptism alone is of no effect or validity whatever.

 

Third, the believer who is raised up out of the watery grave of baptism to walk in newness of life does this not in his own power but in the power of God’s glory, the same power which raised Jesus from the grave. Paul reveals that the power which raised Jesus from the grave was “the Spirit of holiness”; that is, God’s own Holy Spirit (Rom. 1:4). Thus the believer, through the waters of baptism, commits himself to a new life to God and to righteousness, which is to be in total dependence upon the power of the Holy Spirit.

 

This agrees with what Paul says in Romans 8:10b.

   

  And if Jesus is in you, the body is dead because of sin, but the Spirit is life because of righteousness.

   

  God’s Spirit alone can give the baptised believer the power that he needs for this new life of righteousness.

 

It is a general principle of educational psychology that children remember approximately 40 percent of what they hear; 60 percent of what they hear and see; 80 percent of what they hear, see and do. In establishing the ordinance of Christian’s baptism in the church, God has applied this principle of psychology to the teaching of the great central purpose of Jesus’s atonement – that we, having died to sins, might live for righteousness.

 

According to the New Testament pattern, each time new believers are added to the church, they act out, through baptism, their identification by faith with Jesus – first, in His death and burial to sin; second, in His resurrection to newness of life. In this way, baptism keeps before the whole church the great central purpose of Jesus’s atonement.

 

It follows that this vital truth concerning Jesus’s atonement can never be fully restored in the Christian’s church until the true method and meaning of Christian’s baptism are first restored. Christian’s baptism must become once again, for each believer individually and for the church as a whole, a re-enactment of this double truth: death and burial to sin; resurrection and life to righteousness and to God.

 

To complete this study, let me point out briefly that true Christian’s baptism does not produce within the believer this condition of death to sin, but rather it is the outward seal that the believer has already, by faith, entered into this condition. In the verses already quoted from Romans 6, Paul states clearly that we are first dead with Jesus to sin; after that we are baptised into Jesus’s death.

 

In this respect, Christian’s baptism is parallel to John’s baptism. In John’s baptism the person first repented of his sins and afterward was baptised into repentance. In Christian’s baptism the believer is first, by faith, dead with Jesus to sin, and after that he is baptised into Jesus’s death. In each case the outward act of baptism does not in itself produce the inward spiritual condition; rather it is the seal and affirmation that this inward condition has been produced already, by faith, in the heart of the person baptised.

Conditions for Christian’s Baptism

Conditions for Christian’s Baptism

 

  We shall now go on to examine the conditions which must be fulfilled by those who desire to receive Christian’s baptism.

     Repenting

  The first condition is stated in Acts 2:37-38, which records the reaction of the Jewish multitude to Peter’s sermon on the day of Pentecost and the instructions Peter gave them.

     Now when they heard this, they were cut to the heart, and said to Peter and the rest of the apostles, “Men and brethren, what shall we do?” Then Peter said to them, “Repent, and let every one of you be baptised in the name of Jesus Jesus for the remission of sins; and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.”

  Here, in answer to the question “What shall we do?” Peter gives two commands: first repent, then be baptised.

  We have already seen that repentance is the first response God requires from any sinner who desires to be saved. Repentance, therefore, must precede baptism. Thereafter, baptism is the outward seal or affirmation of the inward change produced by repentance.

   Believing

  Jesus Himself states the second condition for Christian’s baptism.

   And He said to them, “Go into all the world and preach the gospel to every creature. He who believes and is baptised will be saved; but he who does not believe will be condemned” (Mark 16:15-16).

   Here Jesus states that everywhere the gospel is preached, those who desire to be saved are required to do two things: first to believe, then to be baptised. The church of the New Testament took Him at His word. Once a person had believed in Jesus for salvation, he was then immediately baptised.

  The experience of the Philippian jailer provides a dramatic example (see Acts 16:25-34). At midnight, in response to the prayers of Paul and Silas, the whole prison was shaken by a supernatural earthquake, and all the doors were opened. The jailer, knowing that he would have to answer with his own life for any prisoners who might escape, prepared to commit suicide. But Paul restrained him, saying, “Do yourself no harm, for we are all here.”

  Under deep conviction, the jailer then asked, “Sirs, what must I do to be saved?” Paul replied, “Believe on the Lord Jesus Jesus, and you will be saved, you and you’re household.”

  Paul and Silas then presented the gospel message to the whole household. Obviously they included in the message the requirement of baptism. Responding with faith, the whole household was immediately baptised. They did not even wait for the light of dawn!

  The response of the jailer and his family is the standard pattern in the New Testament. Baptism was regarded as an urgent requirement, but it was always preceded by faith.

  The first two requirements for baptism, repenting and believing, line up with the first three foundation doctrines presented in Hebrews 6:1-2: 

      1. repentance, 
      2. faith, 
      3. the doctrine of baptisms. 

In experience, as in doctrine, baptism must be built upon repenting and believing.

  A Good Conscience

  A third condition for Christian’s baptism is made clear in the passage where Peter compares the ordinance of Christian’s baptism in water to the experience of Noah and his family, who were saved from the wrath and judgement of God when they entered by faith into the ark. Then, once within the ark, they passed safely through the waters of the flood. In direct reference to this account, Peter says:

   There is also an antitype which now saves us, namely baptism (not the removal of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience toward God), through the resurrection of Jesus Jesus (1 Pet. 3:21).

   Here Peter first dismisses the crude suggestion that the purpose of Christian’s baptism is any kind of cleansing or bathing of the physical body. Rather, he says, the essential condition of Christian’s baptism lies in the inner response of the believer’s heart – “the answer of a good conscience toward God.” This inner response of a good conscience toward God, Peter indicates, is made possible through faith in the resurrection of Jesus Jesus.

  We may briefly summarize the grounds upon which a Christian’s at his baptism may answer to God for his conduct with a good conscience.

   

  1. Such a believer has humbly acknowledged his sins.

  2. He has confessed his faith in the death and resurrection of Jesus as the necessary propitiation for his sins.

  3. By the outward act of obedience in being baptised, he is completing the final requirement of God needed to give him the scriptural assurance of salvation.

   

  Having thus met all of God’s requirements for salvation, he is able to answer God with a good conscience.

 

Becoming a Disciple

  The first three conditions for baptism – repenting, believing and a good conscience – are summed up by a fourth requirement: becoming a disciple. Jesus commissioned His followers to carry the message of the gospel to all nations.

   

  Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptising them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all things that I have commanded you (Matt. 28:19-20).

   

  Here making disciples, which precedes baptising, consists in bringing those who hear the gospel through the first three stages of repenting, believing and a good conscience. This makes new believers eligible for baptism, by which act they commit themselves publicly to a life of discipleship.

 

After this public act of commitment, those who have been baptised need to receive more thorough and extensive teaching that they may become true disciples – strong, intelligent, responsible  professing Christian’s.

 

We may now sum up the scriptural requirements for baptism. The person must first have heard enough of the gospel to understand the nature of his act. He must have repented of his sins; he must confess his faith that Jesus Jesus is the Son of God; he must be able to answer God with a good conscience on the grounds that he has fulfilled all of God’s requirements for salvation. Finally, he must commit himself to a life of discipleship.

 

We conclude, therefore, that to be eligible for Christian’s baptism according to the New Testament standard, a person must be able to meet these four conditions; conversely, any person who is not able to meet these conditions is not eligible for baptism.

   

Are Infants Eligible?

It will be seen immediately that these four conditions listed above for baptism automatically rule out infants. By its very nature, an infant cannot repent, cannot believe, cannot answer with a good conscience to God and cannot become a disciple. Therefore, an infant cannot be eligible for baptism.

 

It is sometimes suggested that there are instances in the New Testament where whole families or households were baptised together and that it is probable that infant members of these households were included with the rest in the act of baptism. Since this has an important bearing on the whole nature and purpose of baptism, it is desirable to investigate this suggestion with care.

 

The two households usually mentioned are the household of Cornelius in Acts 10 and the household of the Philippine jailer in Acts 16.

 

Let us consider first the household of Cornelius. We are told that Cornelius was “a devout man and one who feared God with all his household” – that is, all the members of his household were God-fearing people (see Acts 10:2). Before Peter began to preach to them Cornelius said:

   

  Now therefore, we are all present before God, to hear all the things commanded you by God (Acts 10:33).

   

  This indicates that all those present could hear Peter’s message.

   

  While Peter was still speaking these words, the Holy Spirit fell upon all those who heard the word. And those of the circumcision who believed were astonished, as many as came with Peter, because the gift of the Holy Spirit had been poured out on the Gentiles also. For they heard them speak with tongues and magnify God (Acts 10:44-46).

   

  This indicates that all those present could not merely hear Peter’s message, but also receive the Holy Spirit by faith as a result of that message and speak with other tongues. In fact, it was upon this very ground that Peter accepted them as being eligible for baptism.

   

  Then Peter answered, “Can anyone forbid water, that these should not be baptised who have received the Holy Spirit just as we have?” (Acts 10:46-47).

   

  Furthermore, when Peter gave to the apostles and brethren in Jerusalem an account of what had taken place in the house of Cornelius (see Acts 11), he added another important fact concerning all the members of Cornelius’s household.

   

  Moreover these six brethren accompanied me, and we entered the man’s house. And he told us how he had seen an angel standing in his house, who said to him, “Send men to Joppa, and call for Simon whose surname is Peter, who will tell you words by which you and all your household will be saved” (Acts 11:12-14, italics added).

   

  We learn from this that, as a result of Peter’s preaching in the house of Cornelius, every member of the household was saved.

 

If we now put together the various pieces of information we have gleaned concerning the household of Cornelius, we arrive at the following facts actually stated about them: All of them were God-fearing; all of them heard Peter’s message; all of them received the Holy Spirit and spoke with other tongues; all of them were saved. It is clear, therefore, that all of these were people capable of meeting the New Testament conditions for baptism and that there were no infants among them.

 

Earlier in this chapter we already considered the second passage that describes the baptism of a whole household – that of the Philippine jailer in Acts 16. From this passage we learn the following three facts:

   

  1. Paul and Silas spoke the word of the Lord to the jailer and all who were in his house (v. 32).

  2. He and all his family were baptised (v. 33).

  3. He and his whole household believed (v. 34).

   

  This shows us that all could meet personally the New Testament conditions for baptism and that there were no infants among them.

 

Neither in the household of Cornelius nor in the household of the Philippian jailer nor anywhere else in the New Testament is there any suggestion that infants were ever considered eligible for baptism.

   

  Preliminary Instruction

  Although it is necessary to emphasize the conditions for Christian’s baptism, we must also be careful to guard against an overemphasis on the need for teaching, which leads to unscriptural results. In some places – particularly in certain foreign mission fields – it is common to insist that all those who present themselves for baptism are first subjected to a prolonged period of instruction, extending over weeks or months, before they are accepted for baptism. This practice is traced back to the words of Jesus in Matthew 28:19-20.

   

  Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptising them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all things that I have commanded you.

   

  This emphasis on preliminary teaching is partly due to the fact that in the 1611 King James Version Jesus’s words are translated: “Go ye therefore, and teach all nations . . .” However, the modern version, “Go . . . and make disciples” is more accurate.

 

Let it be granted, however, that those desiring to be baptised must first be taught. The question is, How long does this preliminary process of teaching need to take? Should the time required be measured in months, in weeks, in days or in hours?

 

The events of the day of Pentecost concluded this way:

   

  Then those who gladly received his [Peter’s] word were baptised; and that day about three thousand souls were added to them (Acts 2:41).

   

  The three thousand people whose baptism is here recorded had, a few hours earlier, been open unbelievers who rejected the claim of Jesus of Nazareth to be either the Messiah of Israel or the Son of God. From the end of Peter’s sermon to the moment of their being baptised, the time required by the apostles to give them the necessary instruction could not have exceeded a few hours.

 

Let us see how this corresponds with the response of the people of Samaria to the preaching of Philip.

   

  But when they believed Philip as he preached the things concerning the kingdom of God and the name of Jesus Jesus, both men and women were baptised (Acts 8:12).

   

  No exact period of time for instruction is specified. As on the day of Pentecost, it could have been just a few hours. Certainly it could not have exceeded a few days, or a week or two at the very most.

 

Philip baptised the Ethiopian eunuch on the very same day that he met him and preached the gospel to him (see Acts 8:36-39). Here again the period of instruction could not have exceeded a few hours.

 

Then there is the case of Ananias, who was directed by God to go to Saul of Tarsus and lay hands on him and pray for him.

   

  Immediately there fell from his [Saul’s] eyes something like scales, and he received his sight at once; and he arose and was baptised (Acts 9:18).

   

  Later Paul himself relates that Ananias said to him at this time: And now why are you waiting? Arise and be baptised (Acts 22:16).

   

  We see, then, that Saul of Tarsus (later Paul) was baptised on what was probably the day of his conversion – certainly within three days of the first revelation of Jesus Jesus to him upon the Damascus road.

 

Peter commanded Cornelius and his household to be baptised on the same day that he preached the gospel to them (see Acts 10:48).

 

The Lord opened the heart of Lydia, the seller of purple, to the message of the gospel, and she was then baptised with all her household (see Acts 16:14-15). In this case no further details are given, and no exact period of time is specified.

 

The Philippine jailer and all his household were baptised the very same night in which they first heard the gospel (Acts 16:33).

 

In these passages we have examined seven instances of the baptism of new converts. In every case some measure of instruction was given first. Thereafter, in the majority of these cases, baptism followed within a few hours of conversion. In no case was baptism ever delayed more than a few days.

 

We are thus able to arrive at a clear picture of the practice of baptism in the early church. Before baptism they presented the basic facts of the gospel, centering in the life, death and resurrection of Jesus, and they related these facts to the act of baptism.

 

Baptism then followed immediately – normally within a few hours; at most, within a few days.

 

Finally, after baptism the new converts continued to receive the more detailed instruction which was needed to establish them firmly in the Christian’s faith. This latter phase of instruction is summed up in Acts 2:42, which immediately follows the account of the baptism of the new converts on the day of Pentecost.

   

  And they [that is, those who had been baptised] continued steadfastly in the apostles’ doctrine and fellowship, in the breaking of bread, and in prayers.

     This is the New Testament pattern for establishing new converts in the faith after they have been baptised.

Purifying Effects of God’s Word

Purifying Effects of God’s Word

Cleansing

  The seventh great effect of God’s Word is that of cleansing and sanctification. The key text for this is Ephesians 5:25-27.

   Jesus also loved the church and gave Himself for it, that He might sanctify and cleanse it with the washing of water by the word, that He might present it to Himself a glorious church, not having spot or wrinkle or any such thing, but that it should be holy and without blemish. There are several important points in this passage that deserve attention.

 

Notice, first, that the two processes of cleansing and sanctifying are closely joined together. However, although these two processes are closely related, they are not identical.

 

The distinction between them is this: That which is truly sanctified must of necessity be pure and clean, but that which is pure and clean need not necessarily be in the fullest sense sanctified. It is possible to have purity, or cleanness, without sanctification, but it is not possible to have sanctification without purity, or cleanness.

 

Thus cleansing is an essential part of sanctification but not the whole of it. Later in this study, we shall examine more closely the exact meaning of the word sanctification.

 

Turning again to Ephesians 5:26 we notice, second, that one main, definite purpose for which Jesus redeemed the church is “that He might sanctify and cleanse it”.

 

The purpose of Jesus’s atoning death for the church as a whole, and each Christian in particular, is not fulfilled until those who are redeemed by His death have gone through a process of cleansing and sanctifying. Paul makes it plain that only Christian’s who have gone through this process will be in the condition necessary for their final presentation to Jesus as His bride – and the condition which he specifies is that of a glorious church, “not having spot or wrinkle or any such thing . . . holy and without blemish” (v. 27).

 

The third point to notice in this passage is that the means which Jesus uses to cleanse and sanctify the church is “the washing of water by the word” (v. 26). It is God’s Word which is the means of sanctifying and cleansing; in this respect, the operation of God’s Word is compared to the washing of pure water.

 

Even before Jesus’s atoning death upon the cross had been consummated, He had already assured His disciples of the cleansing power of His Word which He had spoken to them.

   

You are already clean because of the word which I have spoken to you (John 15:3).

   

  We see, therefore, that the Word of God is a divine agent of spiritual cleansing, compared in its operation to the washing of pure water.

 

Side by side with the Word, we must also set the other great agent of spiritual cleansing referred to by the apostle John.

   

  But if we walk in the light as He is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus Jesus His Son cleanses us from all sin (1 John 1:7).

   

  Here John speaks of the cleansing power of Jesus’s blood, shed upon the cross, to redeem us from sin.

 

God’s provision for spiritual cleansing always includes these two divine agents – the blood of Jesus shed upon the cross and the washing with water by His Word. Neither is complete without the other. Jesus redeemed us by His blood so that He might cleanse and sanctify us by His Word.

 

John places these two great operations of Jesus in the closest possible connection with each other. Speaking of Jesus, he says:

   

  This is He who came by water and blood – Jesus; not only by water but by water and blood. And it is the Spirit who bears witness because the Spirit is truth (1 John 5:6).

   

  John declares that Jesus is not only the great Teacher who came to expound God’s truth to men; He is also the great Saviour who came to shed His blood to redeem men from their sin. In each case, it is the Holy Spirit who bears testimony to Jesus’s work – to the truth and authority of His Word and the merits and power of His blood.

 

John teaches us, therefore, that we must never separate these two aspects of Jesus’s work. We must never separate the Teacher from the Savior, nor the Savior from the Teacher.

 

It is not enough to accept Jesus’s teaching through the Word without also accepting and experiencing the power of His blood to redeem and cleanse us from sin. On the other hand, those who claim redemption through Jesus’s blood must thereafter submit themselves to the regular, inward washing of His Word.

 

There are various passages concerning the ordinances of the Old Testament sacrifices which set forth, in type, the close association between the cleansing by Jesus’s blood and the cleansing by His Word. For instance, in the ordinances of the tabernacle of Moses, we read how God ordained that the laver of bronze containing clean water was to be placed close to the sacrificial altar of bronze and was to be used regularly in conjunction with it.

   

  Then the Lord spoke to Moses, saying: “You shall also make a laver of bronze, with its base also of bronze, for washing. You shall put it between the tabernacle of meeting and the altar. And you shall put water in it, for Aaron and his sons shall wash their hands and their feet in water from it. When they go into the tabernacle of meeting, or when they come near the altar to minister, to burn an offering made by fire to the Lord, they shall wash with water, lest they die. So they shall wash their hands and their feet, lest they die. And it shall be a statute forever to them – to him and his descendants throughout their generations” (Ex. 30:17-21).

   

  If we apply this picture to the New Testament, the sacrifice upon the bronze altar speaks of Jesus’s blood shed upon the cross for redemption from sin; the water in the laver speaks of the regular spiritual cleansing which we can receive only through God’s Word. Each alike is essential to the eternal welfare of our souls. Like Aaron and his sons, we must regularly receive the benefits of both, “lest we die.”

   

Sanctification

  Having thus noted the process of cleansing through God’s Word, let us now go on to consider the further process of sanctification.

 

First we must consider briefly the meaning of this word sanctification. The ending of the word – ification – occurs in many English words and always denotes an active process of doing or making something. 

For example, clarification means “making clear”; rectification means “making right or straight”; purification means “making pure,” and so on. The first part of the word sanctification is directly connected with the word saint it is simply another way of writing the same word. Saint in turn is simply an alternative way of translating the word which is more normally translated as “holy.”

 

Thus, the simple, literal meaning of sanctification is “making saintly,” or “making holy.”

 

The New Testament mentions five distinct truths in connection with sanctification:

1) the Spirit of God, 

2) the Word of God,

3) the altar,
4) the blood of Jesus, 

5) our faith. 

Following are the main passages which mention these various truths of sanctification:

   

  God from the beginning chose you for salvation through sanctification by the Spirit and belief in the truth (2 Thess. 2:13).

   

  Peter tells Christian’s that they are elect according to the foreknowledge of God the Father, in the sanctification of the Spirit, for obedience and the sprinkling of the blood of Jesus (1 Pet. 1:2).

   

  Thus, both Paul and Peter mention “sanctification of [or by] the Holy Spirit” as an element of Christian’s experience.

 

Sanctification through the Word of God was referred to by Jesus Himself when He prayed to the Father for His disciples.

   

  Sanctify them by Your truth. Your word is truth (John 17:17).

   

  Here we see that sanctification comes through the truth of God’s Word. Sanctification through the altar is likewise referred to by Jesus. He told the Pharisees on Matthew 23:19:

   

  Fools and blind! For which is greater, the gift or the altar that sanctifies the gift?

   

  Here Jesus endorses that which had already been taught in the Old Testament – that the gift which was offered in sacrifice to God was sanctified, made holy, set apart, by being placed upon God’s altar. In the New Testament, as we shall see, the nature of the gift and the altar is changed, but the principle remains true that it is “the altar that sanctifies the gift.”

 

Sanctification through the blood of Jesus is referred to in Hebrews 10:29. Here the author considers the case of the apostate – the person who has known all the blessings of salvation but has deliberately and openly rejected the Savior. 

Concerning such a person Paul asks:

   

  Of how much worse punishment, do you suppose, will he be thought worthy who has trampled the Son of God underfoot, counted the blood of the covenant by which he was sanctified a common thing, and insulted the Spirit of grace?

   

  This passage shows that the true believer who continues in the faith is sanctified by the blood of the new covenant which he has accepted – that is, by Jesus’s blood.

 

Sanctification through faith is referred to by Jesus Himself, as quoted by Paul as he related the commission which he received from Jesus to preach the gospel to the Gentiles.

   

  To open their eyes and to turn them from darkness to light, and from the power of Satan to God, that they may receive forgiveness of sins and an inheritance among those who are sanctified by faith in Me (Acts 26:18).

   

  Here we see that sanctification is through faith in Jesus. Summing up these passages, we arrive at this conclusion: Sanctification, according to the New Testament, is through five means or agencies: 

1) the Holy Spirit, 

2) the truth of God’s Word, 

3) the altar of sacrifice, 

4) the blood of Jesus and 

5) faith in Jesus.

 

The process may be briefly outlined as follows: 

The Holy Spirit initiates the work of sanctification in the heart and mind of each one whom God has chosen in His eternal purposes. Through the truth of God’s Word, as it is received in the heart and mind, the Holy Spirit speaks, reveals the altar of sacrifice, separates the believer from all that holds him back from God, and draws him to place himself in surrender and consecration upon that altar. There the believer is sanctified and set apart to God both by the contact with the altar and by the cleansing and purifying power of the blood that was shed upon the altar.

 

To accomplish their sanctifying work in each believer is decided by the fifth factor in the process; that is, by the individual faith of each believer. In the work of sanctification, God does not violate the one great law which governs all His works of grace in each believer – the law of faith.

   

  As you have believed, so let it be done for you (Matt. 8:13).

   

  Let’s examine a little more closely the part played by God’s Word in this process of sanctification. First, we must note that there are two aspects to sanctification – one negative and the other positive. 

  • The negative aspect consists of being separated from sin and the world and from all that is unclean and impure. 
  • The positive aspect consists of being made partakers of God’s holy nature.

 

In much preaching, both on this and on other related subjects, there is a general tendency to overemphasize the negative at the expense of the positive. As  professing Christian’s we tend to speak much more about the “do not” in God’s Word than about the “dos.” 

For example, in Ephesians 5:18 we usually lay much more stress upon the negative “do not be drunk with wine” than we do upon the positive “be filled with the Spirit.” However, this is an inaccurate and unsatisfactory way to present God’s Word.

 

With regard to holiness, the Scriptures make it plain that this is something much more than a negative attitude of abstaining from sin and uncleanness. For example, in Hebrews 12:10 we are told that God, as a heavenly Father, chastens us, His children, for our profit that we may be partakers of His holiness. Again, in 1 Peter 1:15-16 we read:

   

  But as He who called you is holy, you also be holy in all your conduct, because it is written, “Be holy, for I am holy.”

   

  We see that holiness is a part of God’s eternal, unchanging nature. God was holy before sin ever entered into the universe, and God will still be holy when sin has once again been banished forever. We, as God’s people, are to be partakers of this part of His eternal nature. Separation from sin, just like cleansing from sin, is a stage in this process, but it is not the whole process. The final, positive result which God desires in us goes beyond both cleansing and separation.

 

God’s Word plays its part both in the negative and in the positive aspects of sanctification. Paul describes the negative aspect of Romans 12:1-2.

   

  I beseech you therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God, that you present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable to God, which is your reasonable service. And do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, that you may prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of God.

   

  There are four successive stages in the process which Paul here describes.

   

1. Presenting our bodies as living sacrifices upon God’s altar. We have already seen that the altar sanctifies that which is presented upon it.

  2. Not being conformed to the world – that is, being separated from its vanity and sin.

3. Being transformed by the renewing of our minds – that is, learning to think in entirely new terms and values.

 4. Getting to know God’s will personally for our lives. This revelation of God’s will is granted only to the renewed mind. The old, carnal, unrenewed mind can never know or understand God’s perfect will.

   

  It is here, in the renewing of the mind, that the influence of God’s Word is felt. As we read, study, and meditate in God’s Word, it changes our whole way of thinking. It both cleanses us with its inward washing and separates us from all that is unclean and ungodly. We learn to think about things – to estimate them, to evaluate them – as God Himself thinks about things.

 

In learning to think differently, we also act differently. Our outward lives are changed in harmony with our new inward processes of thought. We are no longer conformed to the world because we no longer think like the world. We are transformed by the renewing of our minds.

 

However, not to be conformed to the world is merely negative. It is not a positive end in itself. If we are not to be conformed to the world, to what then are we to be conformed? The answer is plainly stated by Paul.

   

  For whom He [God] foreknew, He also predestined to be conformed to the image of His Son, that He might be the firstborn among many brethren (Rom. 8:29).

   

  Here is the positive end of sanctification: to be conformed to the image of Jesus. It is not enough that we are not conformed to the world – that we do not think and say and do the things that the world does. This is merely negative. Instead of all this, we must be conformed to Jesus – we must think and say and do the things that Jesus would do.

 

Paul dismisses the negative type of holiness as quite inadequate in Col. 2:20-22,

   

  Therefore, if you died with Jesus from the basic principles of the world, why, as though living in the world, do you subject yourselves to regulations – “Do not touch, do not taste, do not handle,” which all concern things which perish with the using?

   

  True sanctification goes far beyond this barren, legalistic, negative attitude. It is a positive conforming to the image of Jesus Himself; a positive partaking of God’s holiness.

 

This positive aspect of sanctification and the part played in it by God’s Word, is beautifully discovered in 2 Peter 1:3-4,

   

  His [God’s] divine power has given to us all things that pertain to life and godliness, through the knowledge of Him who called us by glory and virtue, by which have been given to us exceedingly great and precious promises, that through these you may be partakers of the divine nature, having escaped the corruption that is in the world through lust.

   

  There are three main points to notice here.

   

  1. God’s power has already provided us with all that we need for life and godliness. The provision has already been made. We do not need to ask God to give us more than He has already given. We merely need to benefit ourselves to the full of that which God has already provided.
  1. This complete provision of God is given to us through the exceedingly great and precious promises of His own Word. The promises of God already contain within them all that we shall ever need for life and godliness. All that remains for us now to do is to take and apply these promises by active, personal faith.
  1. The result of applying God’s promises is twofold, both negative and positive. 

Negatively, we escape the corruption that is in the world through lust; positively, we are made partakers of the divine nature. Here is the complete process of sanctification that we have described: both the negative escape from the world’s corruption and the positive partaking of God’s nature, of God’s holiness.

  All this – both the negative and the positive – is made available to us through the promises of God’s Word. It is in measure as we take and apply the promises of God’s Word that we experience true scriptural sanctification.

 

Jacob once dreamed of a ladder reaching from earth to heaven. For the Christian’s, the counterpart to that ladder is found in God’s Word. Its foot is set on earth, but its head reaches heaven – the plane of God’s being. Each step of the ladder is a promise. As we lay hold by the hands and feet of faith upon the promises of God’s Word, we lift ourselves by them out of the earthly realm and closer to the heavenly realm. Each promise of God’s Word, as we claim it, lifts us higher above earth’s corruption and imparts to us a further measure of God’s nature.

 

It was for this reason that Jesus prayed to the Father: Sanctify them by Your truth. Your word is truth (John 17:17).

Physical and Mental Effects of God’s Word

Physical and Mental Effects of God’s Word

Physical and Mental Effects of God’s Word

   In the previous session we discovered the following three effects of God’s Word:

  1. God’s Word produces faith, and faith, in turn, is directly related to God’s Word because faith is believing and acting upon what God has said in His Word.

   2. God’s Word, received as an incorruptible seed into a believer’s heart, produces the new birth – a new spiritual nature created within the believer and called in the Scriptures “the new man.”

   3. God’s Word is the divinely appointed spiritual nourishment with which the believer must regularly feed the new nature within him if he is to grow into a healthy, strong, mature Christian’s.

   Physical Healing

  God’s Word is so varied and wonderful in its working that it provides not only spiritual health and strength for the soul but also physical health and strength for the body. Let us turn first to Psalms 107:17-20.

     Fools, because of their transgression,

  And because of their iniquities, were afflicted.

  Their soul abhorred all manner of food,

  And they drew near to the gates of death.

  Then they cried out to the Lord in their trouble,

  And He saved them out of their distresses.

  He sent His word and healed them,

  And delivered them from their destructions 

     The psalmist gives us a picture of men so desperately sick that they have lost all appetite for food and are lying right at death’s door. In their extremity, they cry out to the Lord, and He sends them that which they cry for – healing and deliverance. By what means does He send these? By His Word. 

For the psalmist says:

     He sent His word and healed them,

  And delivered them from their destructions (Ps. 107:20).

     Side by side with this passage in Psalm 107 we may set the passage in Isaiah 55:11 where God says:

     So shall My word be that goes forth from My mouth;

  It shall not return to Me void,

  But it shall accomplish what I please,

  And it shall prosper in the thing for which I sent it.

   You are that word, you shall accomplish and prosper in the thing which He has sent you to do. 

In Psalm 107:20 we read that God sent His Word to heal and deliver; in Isaiah 55:11 God says that His Word will accomplish the thing for which He sent it. Thus God guarantees that He will provide healing through His Word.

  This truth of physical healing through God’s Word is even more fully stated in Proverbs 4:20-22, where God says:

   My son, give attention to my words;

  Incline your ear to my sayings.

  Do not let them depart from your eyes:

  Keep them in the midst of your heart;

  For they are life to those who find them,

  And health to all their flesh 

     What promise of physical healing could be more all-inclusive than that? “Health to all their flesh.” Every part of our physical frame is included in this phrase. Nothing is omitted. Furthermore, in the margin of the 1611 edition of the King James Version, the alternative reading for “health” is “medicine.” The same Hebrew word includes both shades of meaning. Thus God has committed Himself to provide complete physical healing and health.

Remember, what it says in 3 John 1:2,

Beloved, I pray that you may prosper in all things and be in health, just as your soul prospers.

He wants you to be in good health and prosper as your soul prospers. 

 Notice the introductory phrase at the beginning of verse 20: “My son.” This indicates that God is speaking to His believing children. When a Spyro-Phoenician woman came to Jesus to plead for the healing of her daughter, Jesus replied to her request by saying:

   It is not good to take the children’s bread and throw it to the little dogs (Matt. 15:26).

   By these words Jesus indicated that healing is the children’s bread; in other words, it is part of God’s appointed daily portion for all His children. It is not a luxury for which they have to make special pleas and which may or may not be granted them. 

No, it is their “bread,” part of their daily provision from their heavenly Father. This agrees exactly with the passage we read in Proverbs 4, where God’s promise of perfect healing and health is addressed to every believing child of God. Both in Psalm 107 and Proverbs 4 how God provides healing is His Word. This is one further example of the vital truth which we stressed earlier in this series: that God Himself is in His Word and that it is through His Word that He comes into our lives.

  As we consider the claim made in Proverbs 4:20-22 that God’s Word is medicine for all our flesh, we might call these three verses God’s great “medicine bottle.” They contain a medicine such as was never compounded on earth – one medicine guaranteed to cure all diseases.

 However, when a doctor prescribes a medicine, he normally ensures that the directions for taking it are written clearly on the bottle. This implies that no cure can be expected unless the medicine is taken regularly, according to the directions. The same is true with God’s “medicine” in Proverbs. The directions are “on the bottle,” and no cure is guaranteed if the directions are not followed.

 What are these directions? They are fourfold.

   1. “Give attention to my words.”

   2. “Incline your ear.”

   3. “Do not let them depart from your eyes.”

   4. “Keep them in the midst of your heart.”

   The first direction is to “give attention to my words.” As we read God’s Word, we need to give it close and careful attention. We need to focus our understanding on it. We need to give it free, unhindered access to our whole inward being. So often we read God’s Word with divided attention. Half our mind is occupied with what we read; the other half is occupied with those things which Jesus called “the cares of this life.” We read some verses, or perhaps even a chapter or two, but in the end, we have no clear impression of what we have read. Why our attention has wandered.

 

Taken in this context, God’s Word will not produce the effects God intended. When reading the Bible, it is well to do what Jesus recommended when He spoke of prayer; that is, to enter our closet and shut the door. We must shut ourselves in with God and shut out the things of the world.

The second direction on God’s medicine bottle is “incline your ear.” The inclined ear indicates humility. It is the opposite of being proud and stiff-necked. We must be teachable. We must be willing to let God teach us. In Psalm 78:41 the psalmist speaks of Israel’s conduct as they wandered through the wilderness from Egypt to Canaan, and he brings this charge against them: They limited the Holy One of Israel.

 By their stubbornness and unbelief, they set limits to what they would allow God to do for them. Many professing Christian’s do just the same today. They do not approach the Bible with an open mind or a teachable spirit. They are full of prejudices or preconceptions – very often instilled by the particular sect or denomination with which they are associated – and they are not willing to accept any revelation or teaching from the Scriptures which goes beyond, or contrary to, their own set thoughts. Jesus charged the religious leaders of His day with this fault.

    Thus you have made the commandment of God of no effect by your tradition . . . And in vain they worship me, teaching as doctrines the commandments of men (Matt. 15:6,9).

   The apostle Paul had been a prisoner of religious prejudices and traditions, but through the revelation of Jesus on the Damascus road he was set free from them. Thereafter we find him saying in Romans 3:4:

    Let God be true but every man a liar.

   If we wish to receive the full benefit of God’s Word, we must learn to take the same attitude.

 The third direction on God’s medicine bottle is “do not let them depart from your eyes,” with the word them referring to God’s words and sayings. The late evangelist Smith Wigglesworth once said, “The trouble with many Christian’s is that they have a spiritual squint: with one eye they are looking at the promises of the Lord, and with the other eye they are looking in some other direction.”

 In order to receive the benefits of physical healing promised in God’s Word, it is necessary to keep both eyes fixed unwaveringly on the Lord’s promises. One mistake many professing Christian’s make is to look away from God’s promises to the case of some other professing Christian’s who have failed to receive healing. As they do this, their faith wavers, and they, too, fail to receive healing.

   Listen to James 1:6-8,

 He who doubts is like a wave of the sea driven and tossed by the wind. For let not that man suppose that he will receive anything from the Lord; he is a double-minded man, unstable in all his ways 

    A helpful verse to remember in such a situation is Deuteronomy 29:29:

   The secret things belong to the Lord our God, but those things which are revealed belong to us and to our children forever, that we may do all the words of this law…..

   The reason why some professing Christian’s fail to receive healing remains a secret, known only to God and not revealed to man. We do not need to be concerned with such secrets as this. Rather we need to concern ourselves with those things which are revealed: the clear statements and promises of God given to us in His Word. The things thus revealed in God’s Word belong to us and our children forever; they are our heritage as believers; they are our inalienable right. And they belong to us “that we may do them”; that is, that we may act upon them in faith. When we do, we prove them true in our experience.

 The first direction spoke of “attending”; the second spoke of the “inclined ear”; the third spoke of the “focused eyes.” The fourth direction on God’s medicine bottle concerns the heart, the inward center of the human personality, for it says “keep them in the midst of your heart.” Proverbs 4:23,  emphasize the decisive influence of the heart in the human experience.

     Keep your heart with all diligence, For out of it spring the issues of life.

     In other words, what is in our hearts controls the whole course of our lives and all that we experience.

 

If we receive God’s words with careful attention – if we admit them regularly through both the ear and the eye so that they occupy and control our hearts – then we find them to be exactly what God has promised: both life to our souls and health to our flesh.

 

The words of Psalm 107:20 are still being fulfilled today.

   

  He sent His word and healed them, And delivered them from their destructions.

   

  Christian’s who testify today of the healing power of God’s Word can say, as Jesus Himself said to Nicodemus in ohn 3:11:

   

  Most assuredly, I say to you, We speak what We know and testify what We have 

   

  For those who need healing and deliverance:

   

  Oh, taste and see that the Lord is good; Blessed is the man who trusts in Him! (Ps. 34:8).

   

  Taste this medicine of God’s Word for yourself! See how it works! It is not like so many earthly medicines, bitter and unpalatable. Nor does it work, like so many modern drugs, bringing relief to one organ of the body but causing a reaction that impairs some other organ. No, God’s Word is altogether good, altogether beneficial. When received according to His direction, it brings life and health to our whole being.

   

Mental Illumination

   

  In the area of the mind, also, the effect of God’s Word is unique.

   

  The entrance of Your words gives light; it gives understanding to the simple (Ps. 119:130).

   

  The psalmist speaks of two effects produced in the mind by God’s Word: “light” and “understanding.”

 

In the world, today education is probably more highly prized and more universally sought after than at any previous period in man’s history. Nevertheless, secular education is not the same as “light” or “understanding.” Nor is it any substitute for them. Indeed, there is no substitute for light. Nothing in the whole universe can do what light does.

  So it is with God’s Word in the human mind. Nothing else can do in the human mind what God’s Word does, and nothing else can take the place of God’s Word.

 

Secular education is a good thing, but it can be misused. A highly educated mind is a fine instrument – just like a sharp knife. But a knife can be misused. One man can take a sharp knife and use it to cut up food for his family. Another man may take a similar knife and use it to kill a fellow human being.

 

So it is with secular education. It is a wonderful thing, but it can be misused. Divorced from the illumination of God’s Word, it can become extremely dangerous. A nation or civilization which concentrates on secular education but gives no place to God’s Word is simply forging instruments for its destruction. The history of recent developments in the technique of nuclear fission is one among many historical examples of this fact.

 

On the other hand, God’s Word reveals to man those things which he can never discover by his intellect: the reality of God the Creator and Redeemer; the true purpose of existence; man’s inner nature; his origin and his destiny. In light of this revelation, life takes on an entirely new meaning. With a mind thus illuminated, a man sees himself as part of a single comprehensive plan that spans the universe. Finding his place in this divine plan, he achieves a sense of self-worth and personal fulfillment that satisfies his deepest longings.

 

 

It is appropriate to close this session by returning to Hebrews 4:12.

   

  For the word of God is living and powerful [or energetic], and sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing even to the division of soul and spirit, and of joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.

   

  This confirms and sums up the conclusions we have reached concerning God’s Word. There is no area of the human personality that God’s Word does not penetrate. It reaches right down into the spirit and soul, the heart and the mind, and even into the innermost core of our physical body, the joints, and the marrow.

 

In perfect accord with this, we have seen in this and in the previous chapter that God’s Word, implanted as a seed in the heart, brings forth eternal life. Thereafter it provides spiritual nourishment for the new life thus brought forth. Received into our bodies it produces perfect health, and received into our minds it produces mental illumination and understanding.

The Authority of God’s Word

The Authority of God's Word

 

  In our study of this subject, let us turn first to the words of Jesus Himself. He is here speaking to the Jews and is justifying the claim which He has made, and which the Jews had contested, that He is the Son of God. In support of His claim, Jesus quotes from the Psalms in the Old Testament, which He designates by the phrase “your law.” Here is what He says:

     Jesus answered them, “Is it not written in your law, ‘I said, “You are gods” ’? If He called them gods, to whom the word of God came (and the Scripture cannot be broken), do you say of Him whom the Father sanctified and sent into the world, ‘You are blaspheming,’ because I said, ‘I am the Son of God’?” (John 10:34-36).

     In this reply, Jesus makes use of the two titles which have ever since been used more than all others by His followers to designate the Bible. The first of these titles is “the Word of God”; the second is “the Scripture.” It will be profitable to consider what each of these two main titles has to tell us about the nature of the Bible.

  When Jesus called the Bible “the Word of God,” He indicated that the truths revealed in it do not have their origin with men, but with God. Though many different men have been used in various ways to make the Bible available to the world, they are all merely instruments or channels. In no case did the message or the revelation of the Bible originate with men, but always and only with God Himself.

   The Bible – God’s Written Word

  On the other hand, when Jesus used the second title, “the Scripture,” He indicated a divinely appointed limitation of the Bible. The phrase “the Scripture” means literally “that which is written.” The Bible does not contain the entire knowledge or purpose of almighty God in every aspect or detail. It does not even contain all the divinely inspired messages that God has ever given through human instruments. This is proved by the fact that the Bible itself refers in many places to the utterances of prophets whose words are not recorded in the Bible.

  We see, therefore, that the Bible, though completely true and authoritative, is also highly selective. Its message is intended primarily for the human race. It is expressed in words that human beings can understand. Its central theme and purpose are the spiritual welfare of man. It reveals primarily the nature and consequences of sin and the way of deliverance from sin and its consequences through faith in Jesus.

  Let us now take one more brief look at the words of Jesus in John 10:35. Not merely does He set His personal seal of approval upon the Bible’s two main titles – “the Word of God” and “the Scripture” – He also sets His seal of approval quite clearly upon the Bible’s claim to complete authority, for He says, “ . . . and the Scripture cannot be broken.”

  This short phrase, “cannot be broken,” contains within it every claim for supreme and divine authority that can ever be made on behalf of the Bible. Volumes of controversy may be written either for or against the Bible, but in the last resort Jesus has said all that is necessary in five simple words: “the Scripture cannot be broken.”

  When we give proper weight to the Bible’s claim that the men associated with it were in every case merely instruments or channels and that every message and revelation in it has its origin with God Himself, there remains no logical or reasonable ground for rejecting the Bible’s claim to complete authority. We are living in days when men can launch satellites into space and then, by means of invisible forces such as radio, radar, or electronics, control the course of these satellites at distances of thousands or millions of miles, can maintain communication with them and can receive communication from them.

  If men can achieve such results as these, then only blind prejudice – and that of a most unscientific character – would deny the possibility that God could create human beings with mental and spiritual faculties such that He could control or direct them, maintain communication with them and receive communication from them. The Bible asserts that this is in fact what God has done and continues to do.

  The discoveries and inventions of modern science, so far from discrediting the claims of the Bible, make it easier for honest and open-minded people to picture the kind of relationship between God and men which made the Bible possible.

   Inspired by the Holy Spirit

  The Bible indicates plainly that there is one supreme, invisible influence by which God did in fact control, direct and communicate with the spirits and minds of the men by whom the Bible was written. This invisible influence is the Holy Spirit – God’s own Spirit. For example, the apostle Paul says:

     All Scripture is given by inspiration of God and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness (2 Tim. 3:16).

     The word here translated “by inspiration” means literally “inbreathed of God” and is directly connected with the word Spirit. In other words, the Spirit of God – the Holy Spirit – was the invisible, but the inerrant, influence which controlled and directed all those who wrote the various books of the Bible.

  This is stated perhaps more plainly still by the apostle Peter.

     Knowing this first, that no prophecy of Scripture is of any private interpretation (2 Pet. 1:20).

  In other words, as we have already explained, in no case does the message or revelation of the Bible originate with man, but always with God.

  Then Peter goes on to explain just how this took place.

     For prophecy never came by the will of man, but holy men of God spoke as they were moved by the Holy Spirit (2 Pet. 1:21).

     The Greek word translated “moved by” means more literally “borne along by,” or we might say, “directed in their course by.” In other words, just as men today control the course of their satellites in space by the interplay of radio and electronics, so God controlled the men who wrote the Bible by the interplay of His divine Spirit with the spiritual and mental faculties of man. In the face of contemporary scientific evidence, to deny the possibility of God’s doing this is merely to give expression to prejudice.

  In the Old Testament, the same truth of divine inspiration is presented to us in another picture, taken from an activity that goes much further back into human history than the contemporary launching of satellites into space. The psalmist David says:

     The words of the Lord are pure words, like silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times (Ps. 12:6).

     The picture is taken from the process of purifying silver in a furnace or oven built of clay. (Such clay ovens are still used for various purposes among the Arabs today.) The clay furnace represents the human element; the silver represents the divine message which is to be conveyed through the human channel; the fire which ensures the absolute purity of the silver, that is, the absolute accuracy of the message, represents the Holy Spirit. The phrase “seven times” indicates – as the number seven does in many passages of the Bible – the absolute perfection of the Holy Spirit’s work.

  Thus, the whole picture assures us that the complete accuracy of the divine message in the Scriptures is due to the perfect operation of the Holy Spirit, over-ruling all the frailty of human clay and purging all the dross of human error from the flawless silver of God’s message to man.

   Eternal, Authoritative

  Probably no character in the Old Testament had a clearer understanding than the psalmist David of the truth and authority of God’s Word. David writes:

     Forever, O Lord, Your word is settled in heaven (Ps. 119:89).

   Here David emphasizes that the Bible is not the product of time but of eternity. It contains the eternal mind and counsel of God, formed before the beginning of time or the foundation of the world. Out of eternity, it has been projected through human channels into this world of time, but when time and the world pass away, the mind and counsel of God revealed through Scripture will still stand unmoved and unchanged. The same thought is expressed by Jesus Himself.

     Heaven and earth will pass away, but My words will by no means pass away (Matt. 24:35).

    Again, David says:

     The entirety of Your word is truth, and every one of Your righteous judgments endures forever (Ps. 119:160).

     In the last century or two persistent criticism and attack have been directed against the Bible, both Old and New Testaments. However, by far the greatest part of this attack has always been focused on the book of Genesis and the next four books which follow it. These first five books of the Bible, known as the Pentateuch or Torah, are attributed to the authorship of Moses.

  It is rather remarkable, that nearly three thousand years before these attacks against the Pentateuch were conceived in the minds of men, David had already given the Holy Spirit’s testimony to the faith of God’s believing people throughout all ages.

     The entirety of Your word is truth (Ps. 119:160).

     In other words, the Bible is true from Genesis 1:1 right on through to the very last verse of Revelation.

  Jesus and His apostles, like all believing Jews of their time, accepted the absolute truth and authority of all the Old Testament Scriptures, including the five books of the Pentateuch.

  In the account of Jesus’s temptation by Satan in the wilderness, we read that Jesus answered each temptation of Satan by a direct quotation from the Old Testament Scriptures (see Matt. 4:1-10). Three times He commenced His answer with the phrase “It is written . . .” Each time He was quoting directly from the fifth book of the Pentateuch, Deuteronomy. It is a remarkable fact that not only Jesus but also Satan accepted the absolute authority of this book.

  In the Sermon on the Mount Jesus said in Matthew 5:17-18:

     Do not think that I came to destroy the Law or the Prophets. [This phrase ‘the Law or the Prophets’ was generally used to designate the Old Testament Scriptures as a whole.] I did not come to destroy but to fulfill. For assuredly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, one jot or one tittle will by no means pass from the law till all is fulfilled.

     The word jot is the English form of the name of the smallest letter in the Hebrew alphabet, which roughly corresponding in size and shape to an inverted comma in modern English script. The word tittle indicates a little curl or horn, smaller in size than a comma, added at the corner of certain letters in the Hebrew alphabet to distinguish them from other letters very similar in shape.

  What Jesus is saying is that the original text of the Hebrew Scriptures is so accurate and authoritative that not even one portion of the script smaller in size than a comma can be altered or removed. It is scarcely possible to conceive how Jesus could have used any form of speech that would have more thoroughly endorsed the absolute accuracy and authority of the Old Testament Scriptures.

  Consistently throughout His earthly teaching ministry, He maintained the same attitude toward the Old Testament Scriptures. For instance, we read that when the Pharisees raised a question about marriage and divorce, Jesus answered by referring them to the opening chapters of Genesis (see Matt. 19:3-9). He introduced His answer by the question:

     Have you not read that He who made them at the beginning “made them male and female?” (v. 4).

    The phrase “at the beginning” constituted a direct reference to the book of Genesis since this is its Hebrew title.

  Again, when the Sadducees raised a question about the resurrection from the dead, Jesus answered them by referring to the account of Moses at the burning bush in the book of Exodus (see Matt. 22:31-32). As with the Pharisees, He replied in the form of a question:

     Have you not read what was spoken to you by God, saying, “I am the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob?” (Matt. 22:32).

     Jesus here quotes from Exodus 3:6. But in quoting these words recorded by Moses nearly fifteen centuries earlier, Jesus said to the Sadducees of His day, Have you not read what was spoken to you by God?” Note that phrase “spoken to you by God.” Jesus did not regard these writings of Moses as merely a historical document of the past, but rather as a living, up-to-date, authoritative message direct from God to the people of His day. The passage of fifteen centuries had not deprived the record of Moses of its vitality, its accuracy, or its authority.

  Not merely did Jesu accept the absolute accuracy of the Old Testament Scriptures in all His teaching, He also acknowledged their absolute authority and control over the whole course of His own earthly life. From His birth to His death and resurrection there was one supreme, controlling principle which was expressed in the phrase that it might be fulfilled. That which was to be fulfilled was in every case some relevant Scripture passage of the Old Testament. For example, the Bible specifically records that each of the following incidents in the earthly life of Jesus took place in fulfillment of Old Testament Scriptures:

     His birth of a virgin; His birth at Bethlehem; His flight into Egypt; His dwelling at Nazareth; His anointing by the Holy Spirit; His ministry in Galilee; His healing of the sick; the rejection of His teaching and His miracles by the Jews; His use of parables; His betrayal by a friend; His being forsaken by His disciples; His being hated without a cause; His being condemned with criminals; His garments being parted and divided by lot; His being offered vinegar for His thirst; His body being pierced without His bones being broken; His burial in a rich man’s tomb; His rising from the dead on the third day.

     The entire earthly life of Jesus was directed in every aspect by the absolute authority of the Old Testament Scriptures. When we set this fact side by side with His unquestioning acceptance of the Old Testament Scriptures in all His teaching, we are left with only one logical conclusion: If the Old Testament Scriptures are not an accurate and authoritative revelation from God, then Jesus Jesus Himself was either deceived or He was a deceiver.

   Coherent, Complete, All-sufficient

  Let us now consider the authority claimed for the New Testament. We must first observe the remarkable fact that, so far as we know, Jesus Himself never set down a single word in writing – except for one occasion when He wrote on the ground in the presence of a woman taken in adultery.

  He explicitly commanded His disciples to transmit the record of His ministry and His teaching to all nations on earth.

     Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all things that I have commanded you (Matt. 28:19-20).

     Previously He had said:

     Therefore, indeed, I send you prophets, wise men, and scribes (Matt. 23:34).

     The word scribes means “writers,” that is, those who set down religious teaching in written form. It is therefore clear that Jesus intended the record of His ministry and teaching to be set down by His disciples in permanent form. Jesus made all necessary provisions for the absolute accuracy of all that He intended His disciples to put down in writing, for He promised to send the Holy Spirit to them for this purpose.

     But the Helper, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in My name, He will teach you all things, and bring to your remembrance all things that I said to you (John 14:26).

     A further, similar promise is contained in John 16:13-15. Notice that in these words Jesus made provision both for past and for future; that is, both for the accurate recording of those things which the disciples had already seen and heard and also for the accurate imparting of the new truths which the Holy Spirit would thereafter reveal to them. The past is provided for in the phrase He will . . . bring to your remembrance all things that I said to you (John 14:26). The future is provided for in the phrase “He will teach you all things” (v. 26) and again, in John 16:13, “He will guide you into all truth.”

  We see, therefore, that the accuracy and authority of the New Testament, like that of the Old Testament, depend not upon human observation, memory, or understanding, but upon the teaching, guidance, and control of the Holy Spirit. For this reason, the apostle Paul says, “All scripture [Old Testament and New Testament alike] is given by inspiration of God”
(2 Tim. 3:16).

  We find that the apostles themselves clearly understood this and laid claim to this authority in their writings. For example, Peter writes:

     Beloved, I now write to you this second epistle . . . that you may be mindful of the words which were spoken before by the holy prophets, and of the commandment of us the apostles of the Lord and Saviour (2 Pet. 3:1-2).

     Here Peter sets the Scriptures of the Old Testament prophets and the written commandments of Jesus’s apostle’s side by side, as being of precisely equal authority. Peter also acknowledges the divine authority of the writings of Paul, for he says:

     And consider that the long-suffering of our Lord is salvation – as also our beloved brother Paul, according to the wisdom given to him, has written to you, as also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things, in which are some things hard to understand, which untaught and unstable people twist to their own destruction, as they do also the rest of the Scriptures (2 Pet. 3:15-16).

     The phrase “the rest of the Scriptures” indicates that even in the lifetime of Paul the other apostles acknowledged that his epistles possessed the full authority of Scripture. Yet Paul himself had never known Jesus in His earthly ministry. Therefore, the accuracy and authority of Paul’s teaching depended solely upon the supernatural inspiration and revelation of the Holy Spirit.

  The same applies to Luke, who never received the title of apostle. Nevertheless, in the preamble to his Gospel, he states that he “had perfect understanding of all things from the very first” (Luke 1:3). The Greek word translated “from the very first” means literally “from above.”

In John 3:3, where Jesus speaks of being “born again,” it is the same Greek word which is translated “again” or “from above.” In each of these passages, the word indicates the direct, supernatural intervention and operation of the Holy Spirit.

 

On careful examination, that the claim to absolute accuracy and authority of both Old and New Testaments alike depends not on the variable and fallible faculties of human beings, but on the divine, supernatural guidance, revelation, and control of the Holy Spirit. Interpreted together in this way, the Old and New Testaments confirm and complement each other and constitute a coherent, complete, and all-sufficient revelation of God.

  We have also seen that there is nothing in this total view of the Scriptures which is inconsistent with logic, science, or common sense. On the contrary, there is much in all three to confirm such a view and render it easy to believe.

 Initial Effects of God’s Word

   We shall now examine the practical effects which the Bible claims to produce in those who receive it. In Hebrews 4:12 we are told that “the word of God is living and powerful.”

  The Greek word translated “powerful” is the one from which we obtain the English word energetic. The picture conveyed to us is one of intense, vibrant energy and activity.

  Jesus Himself says, “The words that I speak to you are spirit, and they are life” (John 6:63).

  Again, the apostle Paul tells the Christian’s in 1 Thessalonians 2:13 says;

     For this reason we also thank God without ceasing, because when you received the word of God which you heard from us, you welcomed it not as the word of men, but as it is in truth, the word of God, which also effectively works in you who believe.

     Here we see that God’s Word cannot be reduced merely to sounds in the air or marks on a sheet of paper. On the contrary, God’s Word is life; it is Spirit; it is alive; it is active; it is energetic; it works effectively in those who believe it.

   The Response Determines The Effect

The Bible also makes it plain that the manner and the degree in which it works in any given instance are decided by the response of those who hear it. For this reason Jame 1:21 says:

     Therefore lay aside all filthiness and overflow of wickedness [naughtiness], and receive with meekness the implanted word, which is able to save your souls.

     Before the Word of God can be received into the soul with a saving effect, certain things must be laid aside. The two things James specifies are “filthiness” and “wickedness,” or naughtiness. Filthiness denotes a perverse delight in that which is licentious and impure. This attitude closes the mind and heart against the saving influence of God’s Word.

  On the other hand, naughtiness particularly suggests the bad behavior of a child. We call a child “naughty” when he refuses to accept instruction or correction from his senior but argues and answers back. This attitude is often found in the unregenerate soul toward God. Several passages of Scripture refer to this attitude.

     But indeed, O man, who are you to reply against God? (Rom. 9:20).

  Shall the one who contends with the Almighty correct Him? He who rebukes God, let him answer it (Job 40:2).

     This attitude, like that of filthiness, closes the heart and mind to the beneficial effects of God’s Word.

  The opposite of filthiness and naughtiness is described by James as meekness. Meekness carries with it the ideas of quietness, humility, sincerity, patience, the openness of heart and mind. These characteristics are often associated with what the Bible calls “the fear of the Lord”; that is, an attitude of reverence and respect toward God. Thus we read the following description in Psalms of the man who can receive benefit and blessing from the instruction of God through His Word.

   Listen to Psalms 25:8-9, 12-14

  Good and upright is the Lord;

  Therefore He teaches sinners in the way.

  The humble He guides injustice,

  And the humble He teaches His way . . .

  Who is the man that fears the Lord?

  Him shall He teach in the way He chooses . . .

  The secret of the Lord is with those who fear Him,

  And He will show them His covenant (Ps. 25:8-9,12,14).

     We see here that meekness and the fear of the Lord are the two attitudes necessary in those who desire to receive instruction and blessing from God through His Word. These two attitudes are the opposites of those which James describes as “filthiness” and “naughtiness.”

  Thus we find that God’s Word can produce quite different effects in different people and that these effects are decided by the reactions of those who hear it. For this reason, we read in Hebrews 4:12 not merely that God’s Word is “alive” and “active,” but also that it “is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart.” In other words, God’s Word brings out into the open the inward nature and character of those who hear it and distinguishes sharply between the different types of hearers.

  In like manner, Paul describes the dividing and revealing the character of the gospel.

     For the message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved, it is the power of God (1 Cor. 1:18).

     There is no difference in the message preached; the message is the same for all men. The difference lies in the reaction of those who hear. For those who react in one way, the message appears to be mere foolishness; for those who react in the opposite way, the message becomes the saving power of God experienced in their lives.

      This leads us to yet another fact about the Word of God which is stated in that key verse found in Hebrews 4:12. Not only is the Word of God alive and active; not only is it a discerner or revealer of the thoughts and intents of the heart; it is also “sharper than any two-edged sword.” That is, it divides the soul and spirit of those who hear into two classes – those who reject it and call it foolishness, and those who receive it and find in it the saving power of God.

  It was in this sense that Jesus said in Matthew 10:34-35:

     Do not think that I came to bring peace on earth. I did not come to bring peace but a sword. For I have come to “set a man against his father, a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law”.

     The sword which Jesus came to send upon earth is that which John saw proceeding out of Jesus’s mouth – the sharp, two-edged sword of God’s Word (see Rev. 1:16). This sword, as it goes forth through the earth, divides even between members of the same household, severing the closest of earthly bonds, its effect determined by the response of each individual.

Faith

  Turning now to those who receive God’s Word with meekness and sincerity, with the openness of heart and mind, so let us examine in order the various effects it produces.

  The first of these effects is faith.

     So then faith comes by hearing, and hearing by the word of God (Rom. 10:17).

     There are three successive stages in the spiritual process here described:

     1) God’s Word,

     2) hearing, 

     3) faith. God’s Word does not immediately produce faith but only hearing. 

 Hearing may be described as an attitude of aroused interest and attention, a sincere desire to receive and to understand the message presented. Then out of hearing there develops faith.

   It is important to see that the hearing of God’s Word initiates a process in the soul out of which faith develops and that this process requires a minimum period of time. This explains why there is so little faith to be found among so many professing Christian’ss today. They never devote enough time to the hearing of God’s Word to allow it to produce in them any substantial proportion of faith. If they ever devote any time at all to private meditation and the study of God’s Word, the whole thing is conducted in such a hurried and haphazard way that it is all over before faith has had time to develop.

    As we study how faith is produced, we also come to understand much more clearly how scriptural faith should be defined. In general conversation, we use the word faith very freely. We speak of having faith in a doctor or faith in medicine or faith in a newspaper or faith in a politician or political party. 

   In scriptural terms, however, the word faith must be much more strictly defined. Since faith comes only from hearing God’s Word, faith is always directly related to God’s Word. Scriptural faith does not consist of believing anything that we may wish or please to have. Scriptural faith may be defined as believing that God means what He has said in His Word – that God will do what He has promised in His Word to do.

  For example, David exercised this scriptural kind of faith when he said to the Lord:

     And now, O Lord, the word which You have spoken concerning Your servant and concerning his house, let it be established forever and do as You have said (1 Chron. 17:23).

     Scriptural faith is expressed in those five short words: “do as You have said.”

  Likewise, the virgin Mary exercised the same kind of scriptural faith when the angel Gabriel brought her a message of promise from God, and she replied:

     Let it be to me according to your word (Luke 1:38).

     That is the secret of scriptural faith – according to Your word. Scriptural faith is produced within the soul by the hearing of God’s Word and is expressed by the active response of claiming the fulfillment of that which God has said.

  We have emphasized that faith is the first effect produced in the soul by God’s Word because faith of this kind is basic to any positive transaction between God and any human soul.

     But without faith, it is impossible to please Him, for he who comes to God must believe that He is and that He is a rewarder of those who diligently seek Him (Heb. 11:6).

     We see that faith is the first and indispensable response of the human soul in its approach to God.

     He who comes to God must believe (Heb. 11:6).

   The New Birth

  After faith, the next great effect produced by God’s Word within the soul is that spiritual experience which is called in Scripture “the new birth” or “being born again.” Thus James says concerning God:

     Of His own will He brought us forth by the word of truth, that we might be a kind of firstfruits of His creatures (James 1:18).

   The born-again Christian’s possesses a new kind of spiritual life brought forth within him by the Word of God received by faith in his soul. 

  The apostle Peter describes Christian’s as being “born again, not of corruptible seed but incorruptible, through the word of God which lives and abides forever” (1 Pet. 1:23).

  It is a principle, both in nature and in Scripture, that the type of seed determines the type of life which is produced from the seed. A corn seed produces corn; a barley seed produces barley; an orange seed produces an orange.

  So it is also in the new birth. The seed is the divine, incorruptible, eternal Word of God. The life which this produces, when received by faith into the heart of the believer, is like the seed – divine, incorruptible, eternal.

  It is the very life of God Himself coming into a human soul through His Word. John writes:

   Whoever has been born of God does not sin, for His seed remains in him; and he cannot sin, because he has been born of God (1 John 3:9).

   John directly relates the victorious life of the overcoming Christian’s to the nature of the seed which produced that life within him – that is, God’s seed – the incorruptible seed of God’s Word. Because the seed is incorruptible, the life it produces is also incorruptible; that is, absolutely pure and holy.

  However, this Scripture does not assert that a born-again Christian’s can never sin. Within every born-again Christian’s, a completely new nature has come into being. Paul calls this new nature “the new man” and contrasts it with “the old man” – the old, corrupt, depraved, fallen nature which dominates every person who has never been born again (see Eph. 4:22-24).

  There is a complete contrast between these two: The “new man” is righteous and holy; the “old man” is depraved and corrupt. The “new man,” being born of God, cannot sin; the “old man,” being the product of man’s rebellion and fall, cannot help committing sin.

  The kind of life that any born-again Christian’s leads is the outcome of the interplay within him of these two natures. So long as the “old man” is kept in subjection and the “new man” exercises his proper control, there is unsullied righteousness, victory and peace. But whenever the “old man” is allowed to reassert himself and regain his control, the inevitable consequence is failure, defeat, and sin.

  We may sum up the contrast in this way: The true Christian’s who has been born again of the incorruptible seed of God’s Word has within him the possibility of leading a life of complete victory over sin. The unregenerate man who has never been born again has no alternative but to sin. He is inevitably the slave of his own corrupt, fallen nature.

   Spiritual Nourishment

We have said that the new birth through God’s Word produces within the soul a completely new nature – a new kind of life. This leads us to consider the next main effect which God’s Word produces.

  In every realm of life, there is one unchanging law: As soon as a new life is born, the first and greatest need of that new life is nourishment to sustain it. For example, when a human baby is born, that baby may be sound and healthy in every respect; but unless it quickly receives nourishment, it will pine away and die.

  The same is true in the spiritual realm. When a person is born again, the new spiritual nature produced within that person immediately requires spiritual nourishment, both to maintain life and to promote growth. The spiritual nourishment which God has provided for all His born-again children is found in His own Word. God’s Word is so rich and varied that it contains nourishment adapted to every stage of spiritual development.

  God’s provision for the first stages of spiritual growth is described in the first epistle of Peter. Immediately after Peter has spoken in chapter 1 about being born again of the incorruptible seed of God’s Word, he goes on to say in 1 Peter 2:1-2:

     Therefore, laying aside all malice, all guile, hypocrisy, envy, and all evil speaking, as new-born babes, desire the pure milk of the word, that you may grow thereby (1 Pet. 2:1-2).

     For new-born spiritual babes in Jesus, God’s appointed nourishment is the pure milk of His own Word. This milk is a necessary condition for continued life and growth.

  However, there is a warning attached. In the natural order, no matter how pure and fresh milk maybe, it easily becomes contaminated and spoiled if it is brought into contact with anything sour or rancid. The same is true spiritually. For new-born Christian’s to receive proper nourishment from the pure milk of God’s Word, their hearts must first be thoroughly cleansed from all that is sour or rancid.

  For this reason, Peter warns us that we must lay aside all malice, all guile, all hypocrisy, all envy, and all evil speaking. These are the sour and rancid elements of the old life which, if not purged from our hearts, will frustrate the beneficial effects of God’s Word within us and hinder our spiritual health and growth.

  Remember, it is not the will of God that Christian’s should continue in spiritual infancy too long. As they begin to grow up, God’s Word offers them more substantial food. When Jesus was tempted by Satan to turn stones into bread, He replied:

  It is written, “Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceeds from the mouth of God” (Matt. 4:4).

    Jesus here indicates that God’s Word is the spiritual counterpart of bread in man’s natural diet. In other words, it is the main item of diet and source of strength for the spirit man.

   It is significant that Jesus said with emphasis, “every word that proceeds from the mouth of God.” In other words, Christian’s who wish to mature spiritually must learn to study the whole Bible, not just a few of the more familiar portions.

It is said that the Word of God is the seed that bears fruit when watered with faith.

  Beyond milk and bread, God’s Word also provides solid food. The writer of Hebrews rebuked the Hebrew believers of his day because they had been familiar for many years with the Scriptures but had never learned to make any proper study or application of their teaching. Consequently, they were still spiritually immature and unable to help others who required spiritual teaching. 

This is what the writer says Hebrews 5:12-14:

     For though by this time you ought to be teachers, you need someone to teach you again the first principles [or elements] of the oracles of God; and you have come to need milk and not solid food. For everyone who partakes only of milk is unskilled in the word of righteousness, for he is a babe. But solid food belongs to those who are of full age, that is, those who by reason of use have their senses exercised to discern both good and evil 

     What a picture of a great mass of professing Christian’ss and church members today! They have owned a Bible and attended church for many years. Yet how little they know of what the Bible teaches! How weak and immature they are in their own spiritual experience; how little able to counsel a sinner or instruct a new convert! After so many years they are still spiritual babes, unable to digest any kind of teaching that goes beyond milk!

  But it is not their fault, I blame the pastor who provides entertainment and continues to feed them milk while building their kingdom. 

However, it is not necessary to remain in this condition. The writer of Hebrews tells us the remedy. It is to have our senses exercised because of use. The regular, systematic study of the whole of God’s Word will develop and mature our spiritual faculties.

About The Bible

About the Bible

    The Christian’s faith throughout the world today number at least one billion persons. This total includes Christian’s from all sections of the church, in all areas of the earth, and from a multitude of racial backgrounds. Not all these are actively practicing their faith, but all are recognized as adherents. As such, they constitute one of the largest and most significant elements in the world’s population.

    Virtually all of these Christian’s recognize the Bible as the authoritative basis of their faith and practice. The Bible also plays a significant role in two other major world religions: Judaism and Islam. By all objective standards, it is the most widely read and influential book in the history of the human race. Year after year it consistently heads the list of the best-selling books of the world. It is obvious, therefore, that any person who desires a good general education cannot afford to omit the study of the Bible.

    The Bible, as we have it today, is divided into two major sections. The first section, the Old Testament, contains thirty-nine books. It was written primarily in Hebrew – although a few portions were written in a sister Semitic language called Aramaic. The second section, the New Testament, contains twenty-seven books. The oldest extant manuscripts are in Greek.

    The Old Testament describes briefly the creation of the world and, in particular, of Adam. It relates how Adam and his wife, Eve, disobeyed God and thereby brought a series of evil consequences upon themselves, their descendants, and the entire environment in which God had placed them. It then goes on to trace in outline, the history of the first generations descended from Adam.

    After eleven chapters, the Old Testament focuses on Abraham, a man chosen by God to be the father of a special people, through whom God purposed to provide redemption for the entire human race. It records the origin and history of these special people, to whom God gave the name Israel. Altogether, the Old Testament records the dealings of God with Abraham and his descendants over about two thousand years.

    The Old Testament reveals various important aspects of God’s character and His dealings both with individuals and with nations. Included in this revelation are God’s justice and His judgments; His wisdom and His power; His mercy and His faithfulness. The Old Testament particularly emphasizes God’s faithfulness to keep the covenants and promises He makes, whether with individuals or with nations.

     Central to God’s special purpose for Israel was His promise, sealed by His covenant, that He would send them a deliverer with the God-given task of redeeming mankind from all the consequences of his rebellion and restoring him to God’s favor. The Hebrew title of this deliverer was Messiah – which means literally “anointed one.”

    The New Testament records the outworking of this promise in the Person of Jesus of Nazareth. This is indicated by the title given Him: Jesus. This title is derived from a Greek word – Jesusos – which means precisely the same as the Hebrew title Messiah – that is, “anointed one.” Jesus came to Israel as the anointed One whom God had promised in the Old Testament. He fulfilled everything that the Old Testament had foretold about His coming. Viewed from this perspective, the Old Testament and the New Testament are linked together to form a single, harmonious revelation of God and His purposes for man.

The Foundation of the Christian’s Faith

  In various places, the Bible compares the life of a believer to the construction of a building. For instance, the epistle of Jude says: “Building yourselves up on your most holy faith” (v. 20).

    The apostle Paul also uses the same picture in various places:

     You are God’s building.. as a wise master builder, I have laid the foundation (1 Cor. 3:9-1.

    You also are being built together for a habitation of God in the Spirit (Eph. 2:22).

    I commend you . . . to the word of His grace, which is able to build you up (Acts 20:32).

    In all these passages the believer’s life is compared to the construction of a building.

  Jesus the Rock

    What, then, is God’s appointed foundation for the Christian’s life? The answer is given by the apostle Paul: “For no other foundation can anyone lay than that which is laid, which is Jesus” (1 Cor. 3:11).

    This is confirmed also by Peter as he speaks of Jesus: “Therefore it is also contained in the Scripture, ‘Behold, I lay in Zion a chief cornerstone, elect, precious’ ” (1 Pet. 2:6).

    Here Peter is referring to the passage in Isaiah which reads: “Therefore thus says the Lord God: ‘Behold, I lay in Zion a stone for a foundation’ ” (Is. 28:16). Thus Old Testament and New Testament alike agree on this vital fact: The true foundation of the Christian’s life is Jesus Jesus Himself – nothing else, and no one else. It is not a creed, a church, a denomination, an ordinance or a ceremony. It is Jesus Himself – and “no other foundation can anyone lay.”

  Consider the words of Jesus.  

  When Jesus came into the region of Caesarea Philippi, He asked His disciples,

   “Who do men say that I, the Son of Man, am?” So they said, “Some say John the Baptist, some Elijah, and others Jeremiah or one of the prophets.” He said to them, “But who do you say that I am?” And Simon Peter answered and said, “You are the Jesus, the Son of the living God.” Jesus answered and said to him, “Blessed are you, Simon Bar-Jonah, for flesh and blood has not revealed this to you, but My Father who is in heaven. And I also say to you that you are Peter, and on this rock, I will build My church, and the gates of Hades shall not prevail against it” (Matt. 16:13-18).

     It has sometimes been suggested that these words of Jesus mean that Peter is the rock upon which the Christian’s church is to be built, and thus that Peter is in some sense the foundation of Christianity rather than Jesus Himself. This question is of such vital and far-reaching importance that it is imperative to examine the words of Jesus very carefully to ascertain their proper meaning.

    In the original Greek of the New Testament, there is, in Jesus’s answer to Peter, a deliberate play upon words. In Greek, the name “Peter” is Petros; the word for “rock” is petra. Playing upon this similarity in sound, Jesus says, “You are Peter [Petros], and on this rock [petra] I will build My church” (Matt. 16:18).

   The revelation of Jesus being “the Jesus, the Son of the living God” is the rock upon which the church was to be built upon. Not Peter the person as many believe within the Catholic faith. 

   Common sense and Scripture alike confirm this fact. If the church of Jesus were founded upon the apostle Peter, it would surely be the most insecure and unstable edifice in the world. Later in the same chapter of Matthew’s Gospel, we read that Jesus began to forewarn His disciples of His impending rejection and crucifixion. The account then continues:

   Then Peter took Him aside and began to rebuke Him, saying, “Far be it from You, Lord; this shall not happen to You!” But He turned and said to Peter, “Get behind Me, Satan! You are an offense to Me, for you are not mindful of the things of God, but the things of men” (Matt. 16:22-23).

   Here Jesus directly charges Peter with being influenced by the opinions of men, and even by the promptings of Satan himself. How could such a man be the foundation of the entire Christian’s church?

   Later on, in the Gospels we read that, rather than confess Jesus before a serving maid, Peter publicly denied his Lord three times.

  Even after the resurrection and the day of Pentecost, Paul tells us that Peter was influenced by fear of his countrymen to compromise at one point concerning the truth of the gospel (see Gal. 2:11-14).

  Surely, then, Peter was no rock. He was loveable, impetuous, a born leader – but a man just like the rest, with all the inherent weaknesses of humanity. The only rock upon which Christian’s faith can be based is Jesus Himself.

  Confirmation of this vital fact is found also in the Old Testament.

  The psalmist David, prophetically inspired by the Holy Spirit, says this:

   

  The Lord is my rock . . . in whom I will trust; My shield and the horn of my salvation, my stronghold (Ps. 18:2).

     In Psalm 62 David makes a similar confession of faith.

     Truly my soul silently waits for God;  From Him comes my salvation  He only is my rock and my salvation; He is my defense; I shall not be greatly moved.

     My soul, wait silently for God alone . . . He only is my rock and my salvation; He is my defense.  I shall not be moved.  In God is my salvation and my glory;  The rock of my strength, and my refuge, is in God (Ps. 62:1-2, 5-7).

     Nothing could be plainer than that. The word rock occurs three times, and the word salvation occurs four times. That is to say, the words rock and salvation are by the Scripture intimately and inseparably joined. Each is found only in one person, and that Person is the Lord Himself. This is emphasized by the repetition of the word only.

  If anyone should require yet further confirmation of this, we may turn to the words of Peter himself. Speaking to the people of Israel concerning Jesus, Peter says:

     Nor is there salvation in any other, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved (Acts 4:12).

     The Lord Jesus Jesus, therefore, is the true rock, the rock of ages, in whom there is salvation. The person who builds upon this foundation can say, like David:

     He only is my rock and my salvation; he is my defense I shall not be moved (Ps. 62:6).

Confrontation

  How, then, does a person build upon this rock, which is Jesus?

  Let us turn back again to that dramatic moment when Jesus and Peter stood face-to-face and Peter said, “You are the Jesus, the Son of the living God” (Matt. 16:16). We have seen that Jesus is the rock. But it is not Jesus in isolation or abstraction. Peter had a definite personal experience. 

Let’s examine the four successive stages in this experience.

     1. A direct, personal confrontation of Peter by Jesus. Jesus and Peter stood face-to-face. There was no mediator between them. No other human being played any part at all in the experience.

  2. A direct, personal revelation granted to Peter. Jesus said to Peter, “Flesh and blood has not revealed this to you, but My Father who is in heaven” (Matt. 16:17). This was not the outcome of natural reasoning or intellectual understanding. It was the outcome of a direct spiritual revelation to Peter by God the Father Himself.

  3. A personal acknowledgment by Peter of the truth which had thus been revealed to him.

  4. An open and public confession by Peter of the truth which he acknowledged.

     In these four successive stages, we see what it means to build upon the rock. There is nothing abstract, intellectual, or theoretical about the whole thing. Each stage involves a definite, individual experience.

  The first stage is a direct, personal confrontation of Jesus. The second stage is a direct, spiritual revelation of Jesus. The third stage is a personal acknowledgment of Jesus. The fourth stage is an open and personal confession of Jesus. Through these four experiences, Jesus becomes for each believer the rock upon which his faith is built.

The Revelation

  The question arises: Can a person today come to know Jesus in the same direct, personal way that Peter came to know Him?

  The answer is yes, for the following two reasons: First, it was not Jesus in His purely human nature who was revealed to Peter: Peter already knew Jesus of Nazareth, the carpenter’s son. The One who was now revealed to Peter was the divine, eternal, unchanging Son of God. This is the same Jesus who now lives exalted in heaven at the Father’s right hand. In the passage of nearly two thousand years, there has been no change in Him at all. It is still Jesus Jesus, the same yesterday, today, and forever. He was revealed to Peter, He can still be revealed today to those who sincerely seek Him.

  Second, the revelation did not come by “flesh and blood” – by any physical or sensory means. It was a spiritual revelation, the work of the Holy Spirit. The same Spirit who gave this revelation to Peter is still at work in all the world, revealing the same Jesus. Jesus Himself promised His disciples:

     When He, the Spirit of truth, has come, He will guide you into all truth; for He will not speak on His own authority, but whatever He hears He will speak; and He will tell you things to come. He will glorify Me, for He will take of what is Mine and declare it to you (John 16:13-14).

     Since spiritual revelation is in the eternal, spiritual realm, it is not limited by material or physical factors, such as the passage of time or the change of language, customs, clothing or circumstances.

  This personal experience of Jesus Jesus the Son of God – by the Holy Spirit revealed, acknowledged and confessed – remains the one unchanging rock, the one immovable foundation, upon which all true Christian’s faith must be based. Creeds and opinions, churches and denominations – all these may change, but this one true rock of God’s salvation by personal faith in Jesus remains eternal and unchanging. Upon it a person may build his faith for time and for eternity with a confidence that nothing can ever overthrow.

Acknowledgment

  Nothing is more striking in the writings and testimony of the early Christian’s than their serenity and confidence concerning their faith in Jesus. Jesus says:

    And this is eternal life, that they may know You, the only true God, and Jesus Jesus whom You have sent (John 17:3).

     This is not merely to know God in a general way through nature or conscience as Creator or Judge. This is to know Him revealed personally in Jesus Jesus. Neither is it to know about Jesus Jesus merely as a historical character or a great teacher. It is to know Jesus Himself, directly and personally, and God in Him. The apostle John writes:

     These things I have written to you who believe in the name of the Son of God, that you may know that you have eternal life (1 John 5:13).

     The early Christian’s not only believed, but they also knew. They had an experiential faith which produced a definite knowledge of that which they believed.

  A little further on in the same chapter John writes again:

     We know that the Son of God has come and has given us an understanding, that we may know Him who is true; and we are in Him who is true, in His Son Jesus (v. 20).

     Note the humble, yet serene, confidence of these words. Their basis is knowledge of a person, and that Person is Jesus Jesus Himself. Paul gave the same kind of personal testimony when he said:

     I know whom I have believed and am persuaded that He is able to keep what I have committed to Him until that Day (2 Tim. 1:12).

     Notice that Paul did not say, “I know what I have believed.” He said, “I know whom I have believed.” His faith was not founded upon a creed or a church, but upon a Person whom he knew by direct acquaintance – Jesus Jesus. As a result of this personal acquaintance with Jesus, he had a serene confidence concerning the well-being of his soul, which nothing in time or eternity could overthrow.

    Confession

  For several years I conducted regular street meetings in Los Angeles, California. At the close of the meetings, I would sometimes approach people who had listened to the message and ask them this simple question: “Are you a Christian’s?” Many times I would receive answers such as, “I think so,” or “I hope so,” or “I try to be,” or “I don’t know.” All who give answers like these betray one fact: Their faith is not built upon the one sure foundation of a direct, personal knowledge of Jesus Jesus.

  Suppose I were to put that same question to you: Are you a Christian’s? What kind of answer would you be able to give?

  One final word of advice from Job:

   Now acquaint yourself with Him, and be at peace; Thereby good will come to you (Job 22:21).

    

How To Build On The Foundation

   Once we have laid in our own lives the foundation of a personal encounter with Yeshua, one can continue to build upon this foundation?

  The answer to this question is found in the well-known parable about the wise man and the foolish man, each of whom built a house.

     Therefore whoever hears these sayings of Mine, and does them, I will liken him to a wise man who built his house on the rock: and the rain descended, the floods came, and the winds blew and beat on that house; and it did not fall, for it was founded on the rock. Now everyone who hears these sayings of Mine, and does not do them, will be like a foolish man who built his house on the sand: and the rain descended, the floods came, and the winds blew and beat on that house, and it fell. And great was its fall (Matt. 7:24-27).

     Notice that the difference between these men did not lie in the tests to which their houses were subjected. Each man’s house had to endure the storm – the wind, the rain, the floods. Christianity has never offered anyone a storm-free passage to heaven. On the contrary, we are warned that “we go must through many tribulations enter the kingdom of God” (Acts 14:22).

  Any road signposted “To Heaven” which bypasses tribulation (testing) is a deception. It will not lead you to the promised destination.

 What, then, was the real difference between the two men and their houses? The wise man built upon a foundation of rock, the foolish man upon a foundation of sand. The wise man built in such a way that his house survived the storm unmoved and secure; the foolish man built in such a way that his house could not weather the storm.

  The Bible – The Foundation of Faith

Just what are we to understand by this metaphor of building upon a rock? What does it mean for each of us as Christian’s?  Yeshua, Himself makes this very clear.

   Whoever hears these sayings of Mine, and does them, I will liken him to a wise man who built his house on the rock (Matt. 7:24).

   Thus, building on the rock means hearing and doing the words of Yeshua.

Once the foundation – the fact that Yeshua is the Rock – has been laid in our lives, we build on that foundation by hearing and doing the Word of God; diligently studying and applying in our lives the teaching of God’s Word. This is why Paul told the elders of the church at Ephesus:

   And now, brethren, I commend you to God and to the word of His grace, which is able to build you up (Acts 20:32).

   It is God’s Word, and God’s Word alone – as we hear it and do it, as we study it and apply it – that can build up within us a strong, secure building of faith, laid upon the foundation of Yeshua Himself.

 This brings us to a subject of supreme importance in the Christians faith: the relationship between Yeshua and the Bible, and, the relationship of each Christian to the Bible.

 Throughout its pages, the Bible declares itself to be the “Word of God.” On the other hand, in several passages the same title – “the Word” or “the Word of God” – is given to Yeshua Hamashiach  Himself. 

 Here is an example found in John1:1:

   In the beginning, was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we beheld His glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father (John 1:14).

   He [Yeshua] was clothed with a robe dipped in blood, and His name is called The Word of God (Rev. 19:13).

   This identity of the name reveals the identity of nature. The Bible is the Word of God, and Yeshua is the Word of God. Each alike is a divine, authoritative, perfect revelation of God. Each agrees perfectly with the other. The Bible perfectly reveals Yeshua; Yeshua perfectly fulfills the Bible. 

   The Bible is the written Word of God; Yeshua is the personal Word of God. Before His incarnation, Yeshua was the eternal Word with the Father. In His incarnation, Yeshua is the Word made flesh. The same Holy Spirit that reveals God through His written Word also reveals God in the Word made flesh, Yeshua of Nazareth.

   Proof of Discipleship

     If Yeshua is in this sense perfectly one with the Bible, then it follows that the relationship of the believer to the Bible must be the same as his relationship to Yeshua. To this fact, the Scriptures bear testimony in many places.

 Let us turn first to John 14. In this chapter, Yeshua warns His disciples that He is about to be taken from them in the bodily presence and that thereafter there must be a new kind of relationship between Him and them. The disciples are unable and unwilling to accept this impending change. In particular, they are unable to understand how, if Yeshua is about to go away from them, they will still be able to see Him or have communion with Him. 

Yeshua tells them: A little while longer and the world will see Me no more, but you will see Me (John 14:19).

   Here is the final phase of that verse might also be rendered, “but you will continue to see Me.” Because of this statement, Judas (not Iscariot, but the other Judas) asks: Lord, how is it that You will manifest Yourself to us, and not to the world? (John 14:22).

   In other words: “Lord, if You are going away, and if the world will see You no more, how can You still manifest Yourself to us, Your disciples, but not to those who are not Your disciples? What kind of communication will You maintain with us, which will not be open to the world?”

 Yeshua answers: If anyone loves Me, he will keep My word; and My Father will love him, and We will come to him and make Our home with him (John 14:23).

   The key to understanding this answer is found in the phrase “he will keep My word.” The distinguishing mark between a true disciple and a person of the world is that a true disciple keeps Yeshua’s word.

 Revealed in Yeshua’s answer are four facts of vital importance for every person who sincerely desires to be a Christian. For the sake of clarity, let me first repeat the answer of 

Yeshua:If anyone loves Me, he will keep My word; and My Father will love him, and We will come to him and make Our home with him (John 14:23).

   Here, then, are the four vital facts:

1. Keeping God’s Word is the supreme feature that distinguishes the disciple of Yeshua from the rest of the world.

2. Keeping God’s Word is the supreme test of the disciple’s love for God and the supreme cause of God’s favor toward the disciple.

3. Yeshua manifests Himself to the disciple through God’s Word, as it is kept and obeyed.

4. The Father and the Son come into the life of the disciple and establish their enduring home with him through God’s Word.

   The Test of Love

   Side by side with this answer of Yeshua’s, let me set the words of the apostle John.

 He who says, “I know Him,” and does not keep His commandments, is a liar, and the truth is not in him. But whoever keeps His word, truly the love of God is perfected in him. By this, we know that we are in Him (1 John 2:4-5).

 We see from these two passages that it is impossible to overemphasize the importance of God’s Word in the believer’s life.

 To summarize, the keeping of God’s Word distinguishes you as a disciple of Yeshua. It is the test of your love for God. It is the cause of God’s special favor toward you. It is the medium through which Yeshua manifests Himself to you, and through which God the Father and the Son come into your life and make their home with you.

 Let me put it to you in this way. Your attitude toward God’s Word is your attitude toward God Himself. You do not love God more than You love His Word. You do not obey God more than you obey His Word. You do not honor God more than you honor His Word. You do not have more room in your heart and life for God than you have for His Word.

 Do you want to know how much God means to you? Just ask yourself, How much does God’s Word mean to me? The answer to the second question is the answer also to the first. God means as much to you as His Word means to you – just that much, and no more.

   Means of Revelation

There is today a general and ever-increasing awareness among the Christians church that we have entered into the season of time which is foretold in Acts 2:17.

   And it shall come to pass in the last days, says God, that I will pour out of My Spirit on all flesh; your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, your young men shall see visions, your old men shall dream dreams.

   I am humbly grateful to God that in recent years I have been privileged to experience and observe firsthand outpourings of the Spirit in five different seasons of the Move of God. – in which every detail of this prophecy has been enacted and repeated many times over. As a consequence, I believe firmly in the scriptural manifestation in these days of all nine gifts of the Holy Spirit; I believe that God speaks to His believing people through prophecies, visions, dreams, and other forms of supernatural revelation.

   Nevertheless, I hold most firmly that the Scriptures are the supreme, authoritative means by which God speaks to His people, reveals Himself to His people, guides, and directs His people. I hold that all other forms of revelation must be carefully proved by reference to the Scriptures and accepted only insofar as they accord with the doctrines, precepts, practices, and examples outlined in the Scriptures. We are told:

   Do not quench the Spirit. Do not despise prophecies. Test all things; hold fast what is good (1 Thess. 5:19-21).

   It is wrong, therefore, to quench any genuine manifestation of the Holy Spirit. It is wrong to despise any prophecy given through the Holy Spirit. While on the other hand, it is vitally necessary to test any manifestation of the Spirit, or any prophecy, by reference to the standard of the Scriptures and thereafter to hold fast – to accept, to retain – only those manifestations or prophecies which are in full accord with this divine standard. Again, in Isaiah we are warned:

   To the law and to the testimony! If they do not speak according to this word, it is because there is no light in them (Is. 8:20).

   Thus the Scriptures – the Word of God – is the supreme standard by which all else must be judged and tested. No doctrine, no practice, no prophecy, no revelation is to be accepted if it is not in full accord with the Word of God. No person, no group, no organization, no church has authority to change, override, or depart from the Word of God. In whatever respect or whatever degree any person, group, organization or church departs from the Word of God, in that respect and in that degree they are in darkness. 

There is no light in them.

We are living in a time when it is increasingly necessary to emphasize the supremacy of the Scripture over every other source of revelation or doctrine. We have already made reference to the great worldwide outpouring of the Holy Spirit in the last days and to the various supernatural manifestations which will accompany this outpouring.

 However, the Scripture also warns us that, side by side with this increased activity and the manifestation of the Holy Spirit, there will be a parallel increase in the activity of demonic forces, which always seek to oppose God’s people and God’s purposes in the earth.

 Speaking about this same period of time, Yeshua Himself warns us: Then if anyone says to you, “Look, here is the Yeshua!” or “There!” do not believe it. For false Yeshua’ and false prophets will arise and show great signs and wonders, so as to deceive, if possible, even the elect. See, I have told you beforehand (Matt. 24:23-25).

 In the same way, the apostle Paul warns us: Now the Spirit expressly says that in latter times some will depart from the faith, giving heed to deceiving spirits and doctrines of demons, speaking lies in hypocrisy, having their own conscience seared with a hot iron, forbidding to marry (vow of celibacy), and commanding to abstain from foods which God created to be received with thanksgiving by those who believe and know the truth (1 Tim. 4:1-3).

   Paul here warns us that in these days there will be a great increase in the propagation of false doctrines and cults and that the unseen cause behind this will be the activity of deceiving spirits and demons. As examples, he mentions religious doctrines and practices which impose unnatural and unscriptural forms of asceticism in regard to diet and to the normal marriage relationship. Paul indicates that the safeguard against being deceived by these forms of religious error is to believe and know the truth – that is, the truth of God’s Word.

 By this divine standard of truth, we are enabled to detect and to reject all forms of satanic error and deception. But for the people who profess religion, without sound faith and knowledge of what the Scripture teaches, these are indeed perilous days.

 We need to lay hold upon one great guiding principle which is established in the Scripture. It is this: God’s Word and God’s Spirit should always work together in perfect unity and harmony. We should never divorce the Word from the Spirit or the Spirit from the Word. It is not God’s plan that the Word should ever work apart from the Spirit or the Spirit apart from the Word.

   By the word of the Lord the heavens were made, And all the host of them by the breath of His mouth (Ps. 33:6).

  The word here translated “breath” is the normal Hebrew word for “spirit.” However, the use of the word “breath” suggests a beautiful picture of the working of God’s Spirit. As God’s Word goes out of His mouth, so His Spirit – which is His breath – goes with it.

 On our human level, each time we open our mouths to speak a word, our breath necessarily goes out together with the word. So it is also with God. As God’s Word goes forth, His breath – that is, His Spirit – goes with it. In this way, God’s Word and God’s Spirit are always together, perfectly united in one single divine operation.

 We see this fact illustrated, as the psalmist reminds us, in the account of creation. In Genesis we read: The Spirit of God was hovering over the face of the waters (Gen. 1:2).

In verse 3 we read: Then God said, “Let there be light.”

   That is, God’s Word went forth; God pronounced the word light. And as the Word and the Spirit of God were united, creation took place, a light came into being, and God’s purpose was fulfilled.

 What was true of that great act of creation is true also of the life of each individual. God’s Word and God’s Spirit united in our lives contain all the creative authority and power of God Himself. Through them, God will supply every need and will work out His perfect will and plan for us. But if we divorce these two from one another – seeking the Spirit without the Word, or studying the Word apart from the Spirit – we go astray and miss God’s plan.

 To seek the manifestations of the Spirit apart from the Word will always end in foolishness, fanaticism, and error. To profess the Word without the quickening of the Spirit results only in dead, powerless orthodoxy and religious formalism.

   The answer to this question is found in the well-known parable about the wise man and the foolish man, each of whom built a house.

  Therefore whoever hears these sayings of Mine, and does them, I will liken him to a wise man who built his house on the rock: and the rain descended, the floods came, and the winds blew and beat on that house; and it did not fall, for it was founded on the rock. Now everyone who hears these sayings of Mine, and does not do them, will be like a foolish man who built his house on the sand: and the rain descended, the floods came, and the winds blew and beat on that house, and it fell. And great was its fall (Matt. 7:24-27).

  Notice that the difference between these men did not lie in the tests to which their houses were subjected. Each man’s house had to endure the storm – the wind, the rain, the floods. Christianity has never offered anyone a storm-free passage to heaven. On the contrary, we are warned that “we go must through many tribulations enter the kingdom of God” (Acts 14:22).

   Any road signposted “To Heaven” which bypasses tribulation (testing) is a deception. It will not lead you to the promised destination.

 What, then, was the real difference between the two men and their houses? The wise man built upon a foundation of rock, the foolish man upon a foundation of sand. The wise man built in such a way that his house survived the storm unmoved and secure; the foolish man built in such a way that his house could not weather the storm.

  The Bible – The Foundation of Faith

   Just what are we to understand by this metaphor of building upon a rock? What does it mean for each of us as Christian’s?  Yeshua, Himself makes this very clear.

   Whoever hears these sayings of Mine, and does them, I will liken him to a wise man who built his house on the rock (Matt. 7:24).

   Thus, building on the rock means hearing and doing the words of Yeshua.

   Once the foundation – the fact that Yeshua is the Rock – has been laid in our lives, we build on that foundation by hearing and doing the Word of God; diligently studying and applying in our lives the teaching of God’s Word. This is why Paul told the elders of the church at Ephesus:

   And now, brethren, I commend you to God and to the word of His grace, which is able to build you up (Acts 20:32).

   It is God’s Word, and God’s Word alone – as we hear it and do it, as we study it and apply it – that can build up within us a strong, secure building of faith, laid upon the foundation of Yeshua Himself.

 This brings us to a subject of supreme importance in the Christians faith: the relationship between Yeshua and the Bible, and, the relationship of each Christian to the Bible.

 Throughout its pages, the Bible declares itself to be the “Word of God.” On the other hand, in several passages the same title – “the Word” or “the Word of God” – is given to Yeshua Hamashiach  Himself. 

 Here is an example found in John1:1:

   In the beginning, was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we beheld His glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father (John 1:14).

   He [Yeshua] was clothed with a robe dipped in blood, and His name is called The Word of God (Rev. 19:13).

   This identity of the name reveals the identity of nature. The Bible is the Word of God, and Yeshua is the Word of God. Each alike is a divine, authoritative, perfect revelation of God. Each agrees perfectly with the other. The Bible perfectly reveals Yeshua; Yeshua perfectly fulfills the Bible. 

The Bible is the written Word of God; Yeshua is the personal Word of God. Before His incarnation, Yeshua was the eternal Word with the Father. In His incarnation, Yeshua is the Word made flesh. The same Holy Spirit that reveals God through His written Word also reveals God in the Word made flesh, Yeshua of Nazareth.

Proof of Discipleship

     If Yeshua is in this sense perfectly one with the Bible, then it follows that the relationship of the believer to the Bible must be the same as his relationship to Yeshua. To this fact, the Scriptures bear testimony in many places.

 Let us turn first to John 14. In this chapter, Yeshua warns His disciples that He is about to be taken from them in the bodily presence and that thereafter there must be a new kind of relationship between Him and them. The disciples are unable and unwilling to accept this impending change. In particular, they are unable to understand how, if Yeshua is about to go away from them, they will still be able to see Him or have communion with Him. 

Yeshua tells them: A little while longer and the world will see Me no more, but you will see Me (John 14:19).

   Here is the final phase of that verse might also be rendered, “but you will continue to see Me.” Because of this statement, Judas (not Iscariot, but the other Judas) asks: Lord, how is it that You will manifest Yourself to us, and not to the world? (John 14:22).

   In other words: “Lord, if You are going away, and if the world will see You no more, how can You still manifest Yourself to us, Your disciples, but not to those who are not Your disciples? What kind of communication will You maintain with us, which will not be open to the world?”

 Yeshua answers: If anyone loves Me, he will keep My word; and My Father will love him, and We will come to him and make Our home with him (John 14:23).

   The key to understanding this answer is found in the phrase “he will keep My word.” The distinguishing mark between a true disciple and a person of the world is that a true disciple keeps Yeshua’s word.

 Revealed in Yeshua’s answer are four facts of vital importance for every person who sincerely desires to be a Christian. For the sake of clarity, let me first repeat the answer of 

Yeshua:If anyone loves Me, he will keep My word; and My Father will love him, and We will come to him and make Our home with him (John 14:23).

   Here, then, are the four vital facts:
  

1. Keeping God’s Word is the supreme feature that distinguishes the disciple of Yeshua from the rest of the world.

2. Keeping God’s Word is the supreme test of the disciple’s love for God and the supreme cause of God’s favor toward the disciple.

3. Yeshua manifests Himself to the disciple through God’s Word, as it is kept and obeyed.

4. The Father and the Son come into the life of the disciple and establish their enduring home with him through God’s Word.

   The Test of Love

   Side by side with this answer of Yeshua’s, let me set the words of the apostle John.

 He who says, “I know Him,” and does not keep His commandments, is a liar, and the truth is not in him. But whoever keeps His word, truly the love of God is perfected in him. By this, we know that we are in Him (1 John 2:4-5).

     We see from these two passages that it is impossible to overemphasize the importance of God’s Word in the believer’s life.

  To summarize, the keeping of God’s Word distinguishes you as a disciple of Yeshua. It is the test of your love for God. It is the cause of God’s special favor toward you. It is the medium through which Yeshua manifests Himself to you, and through which God the Father and the Son come into your life and make their home with you.

  Let me put it to you in this way. Your attitude toward God’s Word is your attitude toward God Himself. You do not love God more than You love His Word. You do not obey God more than you obey His Word. You do not honor God more than you honor His Word. You do not have more room in your heart and life for God than you have for His Word.

  Do you want to know how much God means to you? Just ask yourself, How much does God’s Word mean to me? The answer to the second question is the answer also to the first. God means as much to you as His Word means to you – just that much, and no more.

   Means of Revelation

There is today a general and ever-increasing awareness among the Christians church that we have entered into the season of time which is foretold in Acts 2:17.

   And it shall come to pass in the last days, says God, that I will pour out of My Spirit on all flesh; your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, your young men shall see visions, your old men shall dream dreams.

   I am humbly grateful to God that in recent years I have been privileged to experience and observe firsthand outpourings of the Spirit in five different seasons of the Move of God. – in which every detail of this prophecy has been enacted and repeated many times over. As a consequence, I believe firmly in the scriptural manifestation in these days of all nine gifts of the Holy Spirit; I believe that God speaks to His believing people through prophecies, visions, dreams, and other forms of supernatural revelation.

   Nevertheless, I hold most firmly that the Scriptures are the supreme, authoritative means by which God speaks to His people, reveals Himself to His people, guides, and directs His people. I hold that all other forms of revelation must be carefully proved by reference to the Scriptures and accepted only insofar as they accord with the doctrines, precepts, practices, and examples outlined in the Scriptures. We are told:

   Do not quench the Spirit. Do not despise prophecies. Test all things; hold fast what is good (1 Thess. 5:19-21).

 It is wrong, therefore, to quench any genuine manifestation of the Holy Spirit. It is wrong to despise any prophecy given through the Holy Spirit. While on the other hand, it is vitally necessary to test any manifestation of the Spirit, or any prophecy, by reference to the standard of the Scriptures and thereafter to hold fast – to accept, to retain – only those manifestations or prophecies which are in full accord with this divine standard. Again, in Isaiah we are warned:

   To the law and to the testimony! If they do not speak according to this word, it is because there is no light in them (Is. 8:20).

   Thus the Scriptures – the Word of God – is the supreme standard by which all else must be judged and tested. No doctrine, no practice, no prophecy, no revelation is to be accepted if it is not in full accord with the Word of God. No person, no group, no organization, no church has authority to change, override, or depart from the Word of God. In whatever respect or whatever degree any person, group, organization or church departs from the Word of God, in that respect and in that degree they are in darkness. 

There is no light in them.

 We are living in a time when it is increasingly necessary to emphasize the supremacy of the Scripture over every other source of revelation or doctrine. We have already made reference to the great worldwide outpouring of the Holy Spirit in the last days and to the various supernatural manifestations which will accompany this outpouring.

 However, the Scripture also warns us that, side by side with this increased activity and the manifestation of the Holy Spirit, there will be a parallel increase in the activity of demonic forces, which always seek to oppose God’s people and God’s purposes in the earth.

 Speaking about this same period of time, Yeshua Himself warns us: Then if anyone says to you, “Look, here is the Yeshua!” or “There!” do not believe it. For false Yeshua’ and false prophets will arise and show great signs and wonders, so as to deceive, if possible, even the elect. See, I have told you beforehand (Matt. 24:23-25).

 In the same way, the apostle Paul warns us: Now the Spirit expressly says that in latter times some will depart from the faith, giving heed to deceiving spirits and doctrines of demons, speaking lies in hypocrisy, having their own conscience seared with a hot iron, forbidding to marry (vow of celibacy), and commanding to abstain from foods which God created to be received with thanksgiving by those who believe and know the truth (1 Tim. 4:1-3).

   Paul here warns us that in these days there will be a great increase in the propagation of false doctrines and cults and that the unseen cause behind this will be the activity of deceiving spirits and demons. As examples, he mentions religious doctrines and practices which impose unnatural and unscriptural forms of asceticism in regard to diet and to the normal marriage relationship. Paul indicates that the safeguard against being deceived by these forms of religious error is to believe and know the truth – that is, the truth of God’s Word.

 By this divine standard of truth, we are enabled to detect and to reject all forms of satanic error and deception. But for the people who profess religion, without sound faith and knowledge of what the Scripture teaches, these are indeed perilous days.

 We need to lay hold upon one great guiding principle which is established in the Scripture. It is this: God’s Word and God’s Spirit should always work together in perfect unity and harmony. We should never divorce the Word from the Spirit or the Spirit from the Word. It is not God’s plan that the Word should ever work apart from the Spirit or the Spirit apart from the Word.

   By the word of the Lord the heavens were made, And all the host of them by the breath of His mouth (Ps. 33:6).

  The word here translated “breath” is the normal Hebrew word for “spirit.” However, the use of the word “breath” suggests a beautiful picture of the working of God’s Spirit. As God’s Word goes out of His mouth, so His Spirit – which is His breath – goes with it.

 On our human level, each time we open our mouths to speak a word, our breath necessarily goes out together with the word. So it is also with God. As God’s Word goes forth, His breath – that is, His Spirit – goes with it. In this way, God’s Word and God’s Spirit are always together, perfectly united in one single divine operation.

 We see this fact illustrated, as the psalmist reminds us, in the account of creation. In Genesis we read: The Spirit of God was hovering over the face of the waters (Gen. 1:2).

In verse 3 we read: Then God said, “Let there be light.”

   That is, God’s Word went forth; God pronounced the word light. And as the Word and the Spirit of God were united, creation took place, a light came into being, and God’s purpose was fulfilled.

 What was true of that great act of creation is true also of the life of each individual. God’s Word and God’s Spirit united in our lives contain all the creative authority and power of God Himself. Through them, God will supply every need and will work out His perfect will and plan for us. But if we divorce these two from one another – seeking the Spirit without the Word, or studying the Word apart from the Spirit – we go astray and miss God’s plan.

 To seek the manifestations of the Spirit apart from the Word will always end in foolishness, fanaticism, and error. To profess the Word without the quickening of the Spirit results only in dead, powerless orthodoxy and religious formalism.